IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i11p411-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor Independence and Financial Integrity in Nigeria: An Analysis of Challenges and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Amos Adejare Aderibigbe

    (Department of Accounting, Crescent University, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria)

  • Ibukun Olalekan Fadairo

    (Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria)

  • Fasilat Iyabode Adepeju Balogun

    (Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The evolving business landscape, with complex corporate structures and global operations, poses challenges and threats to auditor independence, especially in Nigeria. Moreover, the persistent issues of financial and non-financial relationships, reliance on non-audit fees, tenure restrictions, regulatory compliance, technological advancements, and challenges occasioned by internal and external pressures, threaten financial reporting integrity. Stakeholders’ expectations, ethical dilemmas, and globalization further complicate the landscape. Consequently, it is imperative to tackle the challenges associated with financial reporting, focusing on the role of auditor independence in augmenting transparency and confidence in financial information. This study sought to comprehensively examine auditor independence’s conceptualization, maintenance, and impact on financial information reliability. Objectives include assessing dual aspects of unbiased and impartiality in scrutinizing financial records by auditors and analyzing legal implications surrounding their independence. Auditor independence ensures unbiased assessment, enhancing credibility, market stability, legal compliance, and risk mitigation. The exploratory study examined how auditor independence ensures the quality of financial reporting, utilizing secondary sources like books, journals, industry reports, and publications of regulatory and professional bodies. Achieving and maintaining independence demands, adherence to regulatory frameworks, transparent communication, professional skepticism, ethical decision-making, rotation policies, whistle-blower protection, and robust internal controls are pivotal. Reinforcing the importance of auditor independence, through stricter enforcement of audit regulations in Nigeria, will bring about trust and stakeholders’ confidence in the financial reports. The world is evolving, and there is a need for a strong ethical framework by professional bodies, with vigilance, adaptation, and professional development on the part of auditors to uphold independence, while ensuring financial reporting credibility and reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Amos Adejare Aderibigbe & Ibukun Olalekan Fadairo & Fasilat Iyabode Adepeju Balogun, 2024. "Auditor Independence and Financial Integrity in Nigeria: An Analysis of Challenges and Implications," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 411-426, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:411-426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-11/411-426.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/auditor-independence-and-financial-integrity-in-nigeria-an-analysis-of-challenges-and-implications/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razana Juhaida Johari & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Jamaliah Said, 2021. "Investigating factors that influence Malaysian auditors’ ethical sensitivity," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 406-421, June.
    2. Laura Bini & Marco Bellucci, 2020. "Integrated Sustainability Reporting," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-24954-0, September.
    3. Min-Jeng Shiue & Peng-Chia Chiu & Li-Chun Kuo & Shu-Ling Yeh, 2022. "Signing networks of audit partners and accruals quality: evidence from Taiwan," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 464-485, March.
    4. Dart, Eleanor, 2011. "UK investors’ perceptions of auditor independence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 173-185.
    5. Taslima Akther & Fengju Xu, 2021. "An investigation of the credibility of and confidence in audit value: evidence from a developing country," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(5), pages 488-510, May.
    6. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    7. Antle, R & Nalebuff, B, 1991. "Conservatism And Auditor-Client Negotiations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29, pages 31-54.
    8. Tomasz Iwanowicz & Bartłomiej Iwanowicz, 2019. "ISA 701 and Materiality Disclosure as Methods to Minimize the Audit Expectation Gap," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    2. Kathleen M. Bakarich & John “Jack” Castonguay & Patrick E. O'Brien, 2020. "The Use of Blockchains to Enhance Sustainability Reporting and Assurance†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 389-412, December.
    3. Wu, Chloe Yu-Hsuan & Hsu, Hwa-Hsien & Haslam, Jim, 2016. "Audit committees, non-audit services, and auditor reporting decisions prior to failure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 240-256.
    4. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter & Neidermeyer, Presha E., 2019. "Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 121-131.
    5. Haijin Lin, 2006. "Accounting Discretion and Managerial Conservatism: An Intertemporal Analysis," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 1017-1041, December.
    6. Barnes, Paul, 2013. "The effects on financial statements of the litigation cost rule in a civil action for negligence against the auditor," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 170-182.
    7. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    8. Melinda Timea FULOP & Nicolae MAGDAS & George Silviu CORDOS, 2019. "Theoretical Background Of Internal And External Environment Of Negotiation," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(21), pages 1-3.
    9. David Carassus & Nathalie Gardes, 2005. "Audit légal et gouvernance d'entreprise : une lecture théorique de leurs relations," Post-Print hal-03083172, HAL.
    10. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    11. Alleyne, Philmore & Hudaib, Mohammad & Pike, Richard, 2013. "Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 10-23.
    12. Paul J. Beck & Martin G. H. Wu, 2006. "Learning by Doing and Audit Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 1-30, March.
    13. Rick Antle & Elizabeth Gordon & Ganapathi Narayanamoorthy & Ling Zhou, 2002. "The Joint Determination of Audit Fees, Non-Audit Fees, and Abnormal Accruals," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2502, Yale School of Management, revised 02 May 2006.
    14. Rajat Deb & Mukesh Nepal & Sourav Chakraborty, 2023. "IFRS and Audit Quality: A Systematic Literature Review," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(1), pages 118-138, February.
    15. Emna Ben Saad & Cédric Lesage, 2009. "Perception De L'Indépendance De L'Auditeur : Analyse Par La Théorie D'Attribution," Post-Print halshs-00460618, HAL.
    16. Nicole Darnall & Hyunjung Ji & Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura, 2022. "Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms' information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1214-1230, September.
    17. Glenn Feltham & Sean Robb & Ping Zhang, 2007. "Precision in Accounting Information, Financial Leverage and the Value of Equity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1099-1122, September.
    18. Laurence Daoust & Bertrand Malsch, 2020. "When the Client Is A Former Auditor: Auditees' Expert Knowledge and Social Capital as Threats to Staff Auditors' Operational Independence†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1333-1369, September.
    19. Carcello, Joseph V. & Hollingsworth, Carl & Mastrolia, Stacy A., 2011. "The effect of PCAOB inspections on Big 4 audit quality," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 85-96.
    20. Mingcherng Deng & Tong Lu & Dan A. Simunic & Minlei Ye, 2014. "Do Joint Audits Improve or Impair Audit Quality?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1029-1060, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:411-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.