IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v7y2023i7p1715-1732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defence Diplomacy Activities Engendering States’ Cooperation: Addressing Contemporary Global Security Threats in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • David Ngochi Ngari

    (Department of Diplomacy and International Studies, (DDIS) University of Nairobi (UoN), Kenya., P.O. Box 832-00502 Karen, Nairobi)

  • Maria Nzomo

    (Professor of International Relations and Governance, University of Nairobi (UoN), P.O. Box 30197 – 00100 Nairobi – Kenya)

  • Pontian Godfrey Okoth

    (Professor of History and International Relations, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology (MMUST) – Kenya, P.O. Box 190 – 50100 Kakamega – Kenya)

Abstract

Scholars and practitioners in foreign policy deemed defence diplomacy (DD) as a contradiction or ambiguous because institutions claiming to apply it were in the realm of bearing arms for coercion. In the post-Cold War era, DD emerged as leading concept in importance as an instrument of States’ foreign defence and security policies. Globalization imperatives and the pragmatic view of State security through human security perspectives, brought in knowledge on evolution of inter-State’s security challenges. Moreover, States engagement in multilateral diplomacy were on the rise to address emerging cross-border security threats. The roles of defence and security institutions were evolved with emerging security threats particularly in the realm of human security. The paper examines DD activities engendering states’ cooperation, with a view to addressing contemporary global security threats in Africa. It adopted mixed research design employing purposive sampling techniques and strategist paradigm for primary data analyses. It revealed three key DD activities engendering cooperation in African states including: foreign defence and security policy outreach, defence and security cooperation in education and training, and defence and security partnerships cooperation. It concludes that application of DD activities engenders African states cooperation in promotion of peace and security. Finally, the paper recommends that, the African States’ policymakers, particularly in sub-regional security mechanism, should leverage defence diplomacy to promote cooperation between their defence and security institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ngochi Ngari & Maria Nzomo & Pontian Godfrey Okoth, 2023. "Defence Diplomacy Activities Engendering States’ Cooperation: Addressing Contemporary Global Security Threats in Africa," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 1715-1732, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:7:p:1715-1732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-7-issue-7/1715-1732.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/defence-diplomacy-activities-engendering-states-cooperation-addressing-contemporary-global-security-threats-in-africa/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashley, Richard K., 1984. "The poverty of neorealism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(02), pages 225-286, March.
    2. Mehler, Andreas, 2009. "The Production of Insecurity by African Security Forces: Insights from Liberia and the Central African Republic," GIGA Working Papers 114, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Zeev Maoz, 1995. "National Preferences, International Structures and Balance-of-Power Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 7(3), pages 369-394, July.
    3. Giulio M Gallarotti, 2008. "More Revisions in Realism," International Studies, , vol. 45(3), pages 167-192, July.
    4. Ricardo Medeiros de Castro, 2021. "Documento de Trabalho 001/2021- The problematic binary approach to the concept of dominance," Documentos de Trabalho 12021, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    5. Ricardo Medeiros de Castro, 2021. "Documento de Trabalho 01/2021- The problematic binary approach to the concept of dominance," Documentos de Trabalho 2021010, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    6. Colin Wight, 2003. "The Agent–Structure Problem and Institutional Racism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(4), pages 706-721, December.
    7. Zürn, Michael, 1987. "Gerechte internationale Regime: Bedingungen und Restriktionen der Entstehung nicht-hegemonialer internationaler Regime untersucht am Beispiel der Weltkommunikationsordnung," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 5, number 112658, December.
    8. Katzenstein, Peter Joachim, 1990. "Analyzing change in international politics: The new institutionalism and the interpretative approach," MPIfG Discussion Paper 90/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Maggie Dwyer, 2015. "Tactical Communication: Mutiny as a Dialogue in West and Central Africa," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 50(1), pages 5-23.
    10. Robert Pahre & Paul A. Papayoanou, 1997. "Using Game Theory to Link Domestic and International Politics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(1), pages 4-11, February.
    11. Michael A. Witt, 2019. "De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(7), pages 1053-1077, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:7:p:1715-1732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.