IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbraaa/v5y2018p64-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the moderating role of corporate social responsibility in the relationship between socially responsible consumption and quality of work life (QWL) of the staff in Social Security Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdieh Rahmani

    (Iranian Social Security Organization, Yazd, Iran)

  • Akram Eghbali

    (Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran)

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to examine the moderating role of corporate social responsibility in the relationship between socially responsible consumption and quality of work life (QWL) of the staff in Social Security Organization. The research model has been formed using variables such as socially responsible consumption, corporate social responsibility, QWL, and organizational commitment of the staff. Research methodology was a correlation type. The population of this research was the staff of Yazd Social Security Organization. Sampling method was stratified random, where the samples were selected from each class through simple random sampling. A questionnaire was used to collect data through which 290 valid samples were collected. In this study, data were analyzed using SPSS18 software. The relationships between variables and factors were examined by confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling technique using PLS2 Smart software. Moreover, using Sobel test, we have examined the assumption of the mediator role of QWF. The results showed that corporate social responsibility and socially responsible consumption had an impact on the QWL. There was a significant relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and QWL. The results also showed that CSR and socially responsible consumption (SRCO) affected organizational commitment through QWL.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:5:y:2018:p:64-77
DOI: 10.33844/mbr.2018.60192
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/845/mbr.2018.60192.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33844/mbr.2018.60192?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:5:y:2018:p:64-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.