IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbraaa/v4y2017p348-359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying and Ranking the Components Affecting the Failure of Knowledge-based Companies in Iran and its Ranking by AHP Technique (The Case Study: Technology and Science Park of Kermanshah)

Author

Listed:
  • Donya Gholami

    (Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Karaj Branch,Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)

  • Ali Ramezani

    (Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran)

Abstract

In the history, the different methods of economic production have been introduced as the dominant method. All of them have a start time, peak time, and wane time and finally, left scene for another method. Today, we live in an era that the knowledge-based economy is introduced as a dominant method of economic production. It can be said that all countries try to improve in this field by introducing their strategies. In the new method, the different countries try to get away of method of industrial mass production and be successful in producing the developed technologies and offering services by following the innovation in the technology. These services and technologies can attract market because of their innovation. To this end, these advanced technologies will capture a major contribution of the GDP revenues. Since a decade ago, by launching technology-science parks, Iran has tried to support the knowledge-based companies to produce and provide goods and high technology services and therefore, get away from the single-product economy and raw materials sale. In this situation, There are challenges in this field. The present study tries to identify the components affecting the failure of knowledge-based companies and their ranking.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:4:y:2017:p:348-359
DOI: 10.33844/MBR.2017.60380
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/812/MBR.2017.60380.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33844/MBR.2017.60380?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbraaa::v:4:y:2017:p:348-359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.