IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v27y2024i1p121-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of environmental, social and governance policies on companies’ financial and economic performance: A comprehensive approach and new empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Gratiela Georgiana Noja

    (West University of Timisoara)

  • Bianca Raluca Baditoiu

    (West University of Timisoara)

  • Alexandru Buglea

    (West University of Timisoara)

  • Valentin Partenie Munteanu

    (West University of Timisoara)

  • Diana Corina Gligor Cimpoieru

    (West University of Timisoara)

Abstract

In the last decade, the use of integrated reports (IR) comprising information on non-financial indicators from the environment, social, and governance (ESG) category has increased in time. Companies are now focusing not only on financial reporting but are notably including non-financial issues in their public reports. In doing so, they seek to align activities with the expectations of their stakeholders and the society in which they operate, as well as with various regulations, which are increasingly relevant worldwide. This study examines the impact of ESG reporting on company performance. Our research involved analyzing financial and non-financial data from 2,400 companies extracted from the Refinitiv Eikon database. Two methods of quantitative analysis were applied, namely multiple linear regression models processed by the robust regression method and structural equation modelling. Main findings entail that ESG indicators had strong and medium effects on company performance, but these effects varied across different dimensions, requiring a tailored approach to embed ESG factors in corporate strategy to enhance overall performance. Our paper provides a new perspective on the current and the potential impact of ESG reporting, based on systematic theoretical and empirical analyse , with multiple implications for business administration and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Gratiela Georgiana Noja & Bianca Raluca Baditoiu & Alexandru Buglea & Valentin Partenie Munteanu & Diana Corina Gligor Cimpoieru, 2024. "The impact of environmental, social and governance policies on companies’ financial and economic performance: A comprehensive approach and new empirical evidence," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 121-144, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:121-144
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Ferramosca & Roberto Verona, 2020. "Framing the evolution of corporate social responsibility as a discipline (1973–2018): A large‐scale scientometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 178-203, January.
    2. Wolfgang Drobetz & Andreas Schillhofer & Heinz Zimmermann, 2004. "Corporate Governance and Expected Stock Returns: Evidence from Germany," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 10(2), pages 267-293, June.
    3. Wang, Qi & Wu, Chong & Sun, Yang, 2015. "Evaluating corporate social responsibility of airlines using entropy weight and grey relation analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 55-62.
    4. Yu-Jin Chang & Byung-Hee Lee, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Activities on Firm Value: Multi-Level Analysis of Industrial Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Juana M. Rivera & Maria J. Muñoz & Jose M. Moneva, 2017. "Revisiting the Relationship Between Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 482-494, November.
    6. Haixia Wu & Jianping Li, 2023. "The relationship between environmental disclosure and financial performance: mediating effect of economic development and information penetration," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 116-142, January.
    7. James J. Cordeiro & Joseph Sarkis, 1997. "Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 104-114, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoting Liu & Jichang Dong & Kangxian Ji & Xiuting Li & Shijie Xu, 2022. "Investigating the ‘Short Pain’ and ‘Long Gain’ Effect of Environmental Regulation on Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Polluting Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Marcus Linder & Joakim Björkdahl & Daniel Ljungberg, 2014. "Environmental Orientation and Economic Performance: a Quasi‐experimental Study of Small Swedish Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 333-348, July.
    3. Younes Ben Zaied & Béchir Ben Lahouel, 2021. "Does environmental CSR performance matter for corporate financial performance? Evidence from panel quantile regression," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 938-951.
    4. Afef Dhahbi, 2010. "Impact des éléments de gouvernement d'entreprise sur le contenu informationnel des accruals discrétionnaires cas du contexte Français," Working paper serie RMT - Grenoble Ecole de Management hal-00475202, HAL.
    5. André Betzer & Erik Theissen, 2009. "Insider Trading and Corporate Governance: The Case of Germany," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 402-429, March.
    6. Collins G. Ntim, 2013. "Corporate Governance, Affirmative Action and Firm Value in Post-apartheid South Africa: A Simultaneous Equation Approach," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(2), pages 148-172, June.
    7. Mohammed Subhi Al Essawi & Petre Brezeanu, 2011. "The Diversity of Corporate Governance Models. Overview at the Country Level," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 11(2), pages 5-14.
    8. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2578-2587, November.
    9. Claus Holm & Morten Balling & Thomas Poulsen, 2014. "Corporate governance ratings as a means to reduce asymmetric information," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Yıldız, Nurdan & Tüysüz, Fatih, 2019. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach for strategic retail location investment: Application to Turkish food retailing," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Lahouel, Béchir Ben & Zaied, Younes Ben & Song, Yaoyao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2021. "Corporate social performance and financial performance relationship: A data envelopment analysis approach without explicit input," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    12. Ali Uyar & Mehmet Ali Koseoglu & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S Karaman, 2023. "Does firm strategy influence corporate social responsibility and firm performance? Evidence from the tourism industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(5), pages 1272-1301, August.
    13. Steffen Maas & Tassilo Schuster & Evi Hartmann, 2018. "Stakeholder Pressures, Environmental Practice Adoption and Economic Performance in the German Third-party Logistics Industry—A Contingency Perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 167-201, February.
    14. Sylvain Marsat & Benjamin Williams, 2013. "CSR and Market Valuation: International Evidence," Post-Print hal-02156596, HAL.
    15. Amir Louizi & Radhouane Kammoun, 2016. "Evaluation of corporate governance systems by credit rating agencies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(2), pages 363-385, June.
    16. Javed, Attiya Y. & Iqbal, Robina, 2007. "Relationship between Corporate Governance Indicators and Firm Value: A Case Study of Karachi Stock Exchange," MPRA Paper 2225, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Mehmet Levent Erdaş & Emel Bachá Sımoes, 2020. "The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 62(0), pages 255-284, December.
    18. Afshin Najafgholi Doust & Asgar Pakmaram, 2015. "Investigating Effect of Governmental Ownership on the Investment Decisions of Managers," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 14-32, July.
    19. Roberto Maglio & Andrea Rey & Francesco Agliata & Rosa Lombardi, 2020. "Connecting earnings management and corporate social responsibility: A renewed perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1108-1116, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESG indicators; performance; corporate governance; environment; econometric modelling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:121-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.