IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2022i2p157-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Aspects of Transfer of Educational Technologies at Context of Appropriation of Intellectual Product

Author

Listed:
  • Ihor L. Leonidov
  • Daria K. Kovalchuk
  • Valentyna K. Lebedeva
  • Victor N. Tarasevich

Abstract

Results of research of specific of transfer of educational technologies as a demonstration of them appropriation as of intellectual product was represented in the article. The looks of Ukrainian and foreign scientists on the place of educational technologies in the composition of intellectual capital was analysed. The motives of appropriation of the intellectual product as factors of the mechanism of governance of transfer of educational technologies were defined. On a functional level, this mechanism formalises motives of creation of an environment of transfer of educational technologies for a partnership of all interested sides was discovered. Directions of transfer of educational technologies obtained actualisation on the basis of analysis of the marked motives. Composition of subjects of transfer of educational technologies per their roles as seller, legislator (government authorised organs), technological broker, buyer, was concretised. The contradiction of priorities among economic interests, motives and actions at a combination of roles within one subject was revealed. The factors of external appropriation of the intellectual product by subjects on the stages of “preparation – legitimation – restriction” were found out. The common and distinctive traits of the stages of “preparation – legitimation – restriction” were found. The basic criteria of transfer of educational technologies on the stages of preparation, legitimation and restriction were proposed. The criteria of institutionalisation of external interactions of subjects of the transfer of educational technologies were formalised. Updating of an educational network, including the use of open platforms of informatively-communication technologies and cloudy servers, was proposed. Actual directions of further researches of transfer of educational technologies, methodologies of determination of their market prices with the use of modern ICT, development of the special economic-mathematical models of such estimation was delineated.

Suggested Citation

  • Ihor L. Leonidov & Daria K. Kovalchuk & Valentyna K. Lebedeva & Victor N. Tarasevich, 2022. "Economic Aspects of Transfer of Educational Technologies at Context of Appropriation of Intellectual Product," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 157-172.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:2:p:157-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2022/2022-2/8_Ihor-Leonidov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brunner, Karl, 1987. "The Perception of Man and the Conception of Society: Two Approaches to Understanding Society," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 367-388, July.
    2. Robert Ford & Pierre Poret, 1991. "Infrastructure and Private-Sector Productivity," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 91, OECD Publishing.
    3. North,Douglass C., 1991. "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521394161, September.
    4. Douglass C. North, 1991. "Institutions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 97-112, Winter.
    5. Otten, Adrian, 1998. "Implementation of the Trips Agreement and Prospects for Its Further Development," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 523-536, December.
    6. Victor Tarasevich & Valentina Lebedeva & Margarita Yaseva, 2019. "The Intellectual-Informational Good: Value and Market Price," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 100-114.
    7. Robert Grosse, 1996. "International Technology Transfer in Services," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 27(4), pages 781-800, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grigorian, David A. & Martinez, Albert, 2000. "Industrial growth and the quality of institutions : what do (transition) economies have to gain from the Rule of Law?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2475, The World Bank.
    2. Tomasz Iwanow & Colin Kirkpatrick, 2007. "Trade facilitation, regulatory quality and export performance," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 735-753.
    3. Valentina Vučković & Ružica Šimić Banović & Martina Basarac Sertić, 2021. "Governance Trends among New EU Member States: Is There Institutional Convergence?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Arts, Bas & Behagel, Jelle & Turnhout, Esther & de Koning, Jessica & van Bommel, Séverine, 2014. "A practice based approach to forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 4-11.
    5. Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., 2009. "Does Intellectual Monopoly Help Innovation?," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 991-1024, December.
    6. Merchant, Hemant, 2012. "The characteristics and stock-market performance of international joint ventures located in three host-country groups: An extension and empirical validation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1173-1189.
    7. Christian Barrère, 2013. "Heritage as a basis for creativity in creative industries: the case of taste industries," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 12(1), pages 167-176, June.
    8. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Banerjee, Anurag N. & Gorter, Harry de, 2001. "Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection: An econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 25-43, October.
    9. Lundström, Susanna, 2002. "Decomposed Effects of Democracy on Economic Freedom," Working Papers in Economics 74, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    10. Evgeny V. Popov & Anna Y. Veretennikova & Ksenia M. Kozinskaya, 2018. "Formal Institutional Environment Influence on Social Entrepreneurship in Developed Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 45-56.
    11. Rout, S., 2008. "Institutional and policy reforms in water sector in India: review of issues, concepts and trends," Conference Papers h042926, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Jacob Hörisch & Jana Kollat & Steven A. Brieger, 2017. "What influences environmental entrepreneurship? A multilevel analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurs’ environmental orientation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 47-69, January.
    13. Sebastian Galiani & Sukkoo Kim, 2008. "Political Centralization and Urban Primacy: Evidence from National and Provincial Capitals in the Americas," NBER Chapters, in: Understanding Long-Run Economic Growth: Geography, Institutions, and the Knowledge Economy, pages 121-153, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Kemp, R. & van den Bergh, J., 2006. "Economics and Transitions: Lessons from Economic Sub-disciplines," MERIT Working Papers 2006-038, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Kourula, Arno, 2010. "Corporate engagement with non-governmental organizations in different institutional contexts--A case study of a forest products company," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 395-404, October.
    16. Dietrich Fischer & Jurgen Brauer, 2003. "Twenty questions for peace economics: A research agenda," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 223-236.
    17. Utku Utkulu & Durmus Özdemir, 2005. "Does Trade Liberalization Cause a Long Run Economic Growth in Turkey," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 245-266, September.
    18. Ernest Gnan & Jürgen Janger & Johann Scharler, 2004. "Determinants of Long-Term Growth in Austria – A Call for a National Growth Strategy," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 1, pages 23-46.
    19. Franke, Anja & Gawrich, Andrea & Melnykovska, Inna & Schweickert, Rainer, 2009. "Resource-based reluctance, reversed asymmetry, and non-trade integration incentives: theory and evidence from European neighbourhood," Kiel Working Papers 1551, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Pouria Ataei & Hassan Sadighi & Mohammad Chizari & Enayat Abbasi, 2020. "In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7215-7237, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:2:p:157-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.