IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220206528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Potential Management In Forming Strategic Partnership Of Science-Business-Education

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Shkoda

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

  • Mariia Tepliuk

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

  • Mykhailo Sahaidak

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to identify the components of the enterprise intellectual potential, which are promising areas of intellectual potential management that is the basis of a strategic partnership between business, science and education in the brewing industry of Ukraine. The novelty of the research is represented by the created theoretical model disclosing the specific advantages of such partnership for business, science and education in the context of intellectual potential management. The object of the scientific research is the process of the intellectual potential management and its role in forming strategic partnership of science-business-education. The research method includes the method of structural-logical analysis, the method of analysis and synthesis, the method of comparative analysis, statistical data and information analysis etc. The proposed algorithm for estimating the enterprise intellectual potential at the appropriate level of management includes ten stages, performing of which allows to get the calculated use level of the intellectual potential and its components: 1) providing the definition of generalized components of the enterprise’s potential and its important subspecies; 2) selecting and calculating the list of the indicators for defining the relative efficiency; 3) calculating the relative coefficients’ values for each enterprise considering average values in dependence of the type of activity; 4) aligning the contribution of the each subspecies of the potential; 5) calculating the efficiency coefficient of the consolidated relative use for each subspecies; 6) rationing the consolidated relative efficiency coefficient depending on their product; 7) calculating the potential share of each subspecies in the total value; 8) redistributing the obtained results by the components of the potential; 9) calculating the realized value of intellectual potential; 10) calculating the use level of intellectual potential and its components. The research is based on the Ukrainian brewing industry’s data for the period of 2016-2019. The obtained results highlight the most problematic components of the intellectual resources of the brewing companies in Ukraine such as "human resources", "technological resources" and "management resources". These components are recommended to be considered as the most promising areas of the intellectual potential development of the brewing enterprises in strategic partnership with educational and scientific institutions. The practical value of the proposed instruments for the brewing enterprises is in the use of the adapted graphanalytical model, which gives the opportunity to assess the structural components of intellectual potential of the enterprise and define the strategic directions of perspective partnership.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Shkoda & Mariia Tepliuk & Mykhailo Sahaidak, 2020. "Intellectual Potential Management In Forming Strategic Partnership Of Science-Business-Education," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:5:28
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-5-221-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/946/1000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/946
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-5-221-232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bontis, Nick & Dragonetti, Nicola C. & Jacobsen, Kristine & Roos, Göran, 1999. "The knowledge toolbox:: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 391-402, August.
    2. Grigory Bashnyanin & Valentina Kutsyk & Irena Svidruk, 2019. "The Level Of Knowledge Intensity Of The Country'S Economic System," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Indra Abeysekera, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management Research towards Value Creation. From the Past to the Future," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Daniel RUSU, 2022. "Association of Knowledge Management with Strategic Management: Directions and Trends at International Level," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 49-66, February.
    4. Ayat Sami ODEIBAT, 2021. "The Effect Of Technology Evolution On The Future Of Jobs," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 57-67, June.
    5. O. Zeynep Akşin, 2007. "On valuing appreciating human assets in services," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 221-235, March.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3748 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Giuseppe Marzo, 2013. "Some Unintended Consequences of Metaphors: The Case of Capital in Intellectual Capital Research," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 111-140.
    8. Ljupco Eftimov; & Lucija Eftimova & Marina Serafimoska, 2008. "The Importance Of Balanced Scorecard As A Strategic Management Tool And Its Implementation In The Companies In R. Macedonia And Worldwide," Journal Articles, Center For Economic Analyses, pages 21-32, December.
    9. Angel Barajas & Elena Shakina, 2012. "The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital Quality And Corporate Performances: An Empirical Study Of Russian And European Companies," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 57(192), pages 79-98, January –.
    10. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2016. "Main drivers of human capital, learning and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 961-978, October.
    11. Rizwan Ellahi & Noman Mahmood & Bazla Ali Khan, 2020. "Concept of Inclusive Optimal Performance (IOP): Theoretical and Conceptual understanding on the inclusive relationship between Internal Simultaneous Performance (ISP) and External Simultaneous Perform," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 101-124.
    12. Norasyikin Shaikh Ibrahim & Junaidah Hashim & Rozailin Abdul Rahman, 2018. "The Impact of Employer Branding and Career Growth on Talent Retention: The Mediating Role of Recruitment Practices in the Malaysian Public Sector," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(6), pages 1034-1053, June.
    13. Rossidis Ioannis & Dimitrios Belias, 2020. "Combining Strategic Management with Knowledge Management: Trends and International Perspectives," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 39-45.
    14. Mohamed Ali Boujelbene & Habib Affes, 2013. "Perceptions Du Capital Intellectuel Par Les Managers Etude Empirique Dans Le Contexte Tunisien," Post-Print hal-00991699, HAL.
    15. Ferrer, Julian & Ríos, Manriquez, 2006. "Administración del conocimiento en instituciones de educación superior. Un análisis conceptual [Knowledge management in higher education. A conceptual analysis]," MPRA Paper 2622, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Adamu Jibir & Musa Abdu, 2021. "Human Capital and Propensity to Protect Intellectual Properties as Innovation Output: the Case of Nigerian Manufacturing and Service Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 595-619, June.
    17. Charles Daussy, 2013. "Can Social Responsibility Paradoxically Strengthen The Importance Of Finance?," Post-Print hal-01002375, HAL.
    18. Faryal Siddiqui, 2012. "Human Capital Management: An Emerging Human Resource Management Practice," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 353-367, February.
    19. Faizi Weqar & Ahmed Musa Khan & Mohd. Anas Raushan & S. M. Imamul Haque, 2021. "Measuring the Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Financial Performance of the Finance Sector of India," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(3), pages 1134-1151, September.
    20. Prasoon Mani Tripathi & Varun Chotia & Umesh Solanki & Rahul Meena & Vinay Khandelwal, 2022. "Economic Value Added Research: Mapping Thematic Structure and Research Trends," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    21. Guangchun Jin & Jian Xu, 2022. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Leverage of Chinese Agricultural Companies? Exploring the Role of Firm Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intellectual resources; estimation algorithm; intellectual potential; management; strategic partnership; brewing enterprises;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:5:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.