IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220206110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Determinants Of Innovative Development In The Economy Of The Xxi Century

Author

Listed:
  • Vasyl Lagutin

    (Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

  • Yuliya Yasko

    (Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article analyzed the problem of institutional determinants of innovative development in the 21st century, which is not yet sufficiently understood in a scientific sense. It is established that poor quality and inconsistency of institutions with macro– and microeconomic mechanisms exacerbates the problem of institutional determinants of providing innovative development in the economy of the 21st century. The subject of the research is the institutional determinants (a set of formal and informal rules and regulations, incentives and mechanisms) that determine the provision of innovative development. Economic development implies a progressive change in the institutional environment of the national innovation system. In the context of the above, it is proved that the peculiarities of the content of institutional determinants of innovative development in Ukraine are characterized by complication of interconnections and forms of manifestation, strengthening of transformational tendencies. It is determined that the effect of institutional determinants is manifested through the influence of three types of institutions: primary (basic) market institutions (protection of property rights and investments, observance of rights and obligations, fixed by the contract system, freedom competition); development institutes (regulatory environment, business climate, regulatory business opportunities, judicial independence); institutes of efficiency (developed human and social capital, effective legislative support, impartiality of judges, reliability of law enforcement agencies. The research methodology is based on the methods of a holistic systematic approach to institutional analysis, interconnections and the logic of institutional determinants of innovation development. It is crucial to build holistic logical constructs (based on a model of innovative behavior) that allow a full analysis of existing institutional relationships. The purpose of the research is to analyze the institutional determinants of innovation development in the economy of the 21st century, to evaluate possible directions for more effective innovation management. Regulation of scientific aspects of institutes and institutional determinants allowed to re-evaluate traditional problems of innovative development. The main conclusions of the research relate to the justification of the set of institutional determinants that ensure the effective interdependence of institutional and innovation dynamics. It is argued that the institutional determinants of innovative change cannot be considered outside the interconnections. It is determined that the most problematic issues of readiness for innovation are: a small proportion of firms that are able to perceive and implement innovative technologies, lack of sufficient resources, low interest in purchasing new technological products. It is established that the effective use of institutional determinants of innovative development is possible only on the basis of the formation and effective implementation of the mechanism for managing the institutional stimulation of relevant innovation changes. It has been shown that scientific clarification of institutional determinants is a prerequisite for a deeper analysis of the effective development of the national innovation system. Only effective institutions can provide the necessary opportunities for innovative development. In this context, there is a need to further expand the institutional research of the innovation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasyl Lagutin & Yuliya Yasko, 2020. "Institutional Determinants Of Innovative Development In The Economy Of The Xxi Century," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:1:10
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-74-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/768
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-74-79?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greif,Avner, 2006. "Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521480444, September.
    2. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano, 2019. "Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1347-1366, October.
    3. Dani Rodrik, 2007. "Introductiion to One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth," Introductory Chapters, in: One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Davide Cantoni & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2011. "The Consequences of Radical Reform: The French Revolution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3286-3307, December.
    2. Ligang Song & Chérie Simpson, 2018. "Linking “adaptive efficiency” with the basic market functions: A new analytical perspective for institution and policy analysis," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 544-557, September.
    3. Dieleman, Marleen & Markus, Stanislav & Rajwani, Tazeeb & White, George O., 2022. "Revisiting Institutional Voids: Advancing the International Business Literature by Leveraging Social Sciences," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    4. Boettke, Peter J. & Coyne, Christopher J. & Leeson, Peter T., 2013. "Comparative historical political economy," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 285-301, September.
    5. Tomasz Legiedz, 2020. "Economic policy for development and the new institutional economics," Catallaxy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(2), pages 61-73, December.
    6. Lawrence Sáez, 2013. "Methods in governance research: a review of research approaches," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-017-13, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    7. Coşgel, Metin M. & Miceli, Thomas J. & Rubin, Jared, 2012. "The political economy of mass printing: Legitimacy and technological change in the Ottoman Empire," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 357-371.
    8. Gordon L Clark & Ashby H B Monk, 2014. "The Geography of Investment Management Contracts: The UK, Europe, and the Global Financial Services Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 531-549, March.
    9. Robert Roßner & Dimitrios Zikos, 2018. "The Role of Homogeneity and Heterogeneity Among Resource Users on Water Governance: Lessons Learnt from an Economic Field Experiment on Irrigation in Uzbekistan," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    10. Fredy Cepeda-Lopez & Fredy Gamboa-Estrada & Carlos Leon-Rincón & Hernán Rincon-Castro, 2022. "Colombian Liberalization and Integration into World Trade Markets: Much Ado about Nothing," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 25(2), pages 1-44, December.
    11. Louis Corriveau, 2012. "Game theory and the kula," Rationality and Society, , vol. 24(1), pages 106-128, February.
    12. Mayshar, Joram & Moav, Omer & Neeman, Zvika, 2011. "Transparency, Appropriability and the Early State," CEPR Discussion Papers 8548, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Fenske, James, 2014. "Trees, tenure and conflict: Rubber in colonial Benin," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 226-238.
    14. Bramoullé, Yann & Goyal, Sanjeev, 2016. "Favoritism," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 16-27.
    15. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2016. "Long-Term Persistence," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(6), pages 1401-1436, December.
    16. Johnson, Noel D. & Koyama, Mark, 2017. "Jewish communities and city growth in preindustrial Europe," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 339-354.
    17. Mark Harrison & Nikolaus Wolf, 2014. "The Frequency of Wars," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMICS OF COERCION AND CONFLICT, chapter 5, pages 121-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    18. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    19. Mika Kallioinen, 2017. "Inter‐communal institutions in medieval trade," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1131-1152, November.
    20. Jean-Paul Fitoussi & Francesco Saraceno, 2013. "European economic governance: the Berlin–Washington Consensus," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(3), pages 479-496.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    institutes; institutional determinants; institutional stimulation; innovations; innovative system; innovative development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:1:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.