IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aye/journl/v3y2017i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Türkiye’de Özgür ve Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım Üretimi: Bireysel ve Sosyal Motivasyonların Karsılaştırmalı Analizi

Author

Listed:
  • Serhat Koloğlugil

    (Işık Üniversitesi Ekonomi Bölümü)

  • Burcu Tekeş

    (Orta Dogu Teknik Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü Doktor Adayı)

  • Mercan Atalay

    (Istanbul Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü Doktor Adayı)

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın ana amacı Türkiye’de özgür ve açık kaynak kodlu yazılım (ÖAKKY) üreten yazılımcıların bu uğraşlarının arkasında yatan temel motivasyonlarının araştırılmasıdır. ÖAKKY üretim modeli, bilginin ve dijital kaynakların ortak kullanımı ve paylaşımına dayalı yeni bir kurumsal yapıyı örneklemektedir. Sahipli yazılımların aksine, dijital ekonomiye özgü bu yeni sosyo-teknolojik yapıda yazılım teknolojisi kaynak koda erişimin herkese açık olduğu bir modelde geliştirilmektedir. Mevcut çalısmada, bu modelin arkasında yatan bireysel ve sosyal motivasyonların anlaşılması için nicel ve nitel boyutların birlikte yer aldığı karma yöntem kullanılmıştır. Çalısmanın sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye’de ÖAKKY projelerine katkı yapan yazılımcıları harekete geçirmede hem bireysel hem de sosyal motivasyonlar önemli rol oynamaktadır. Fakat, bireysel ve sosyal motivasyonların yazılımcılar üzerindeki etkileri birbirinden farklılaşmaktadır. Etik ve paylaşımcı ilkelere dayanan sosyal motivasyonlar daha ziyade yazılımcıların ÖAKKY ile ilgilenmeye baslamalarında, bir kullanıcı olarak günlük hayatlarında ÖAKKY kullanmalarında ve ÖAKKY’nin iki ayrı tanımının oluşmasında (özgür yazılım ve açık kayna kodlu yazılım) etkili gözükmektedir. Yazılımcının teknik bilgi ve becerisinin gelişmesi, yazılım camiası içindeki repütasyonunun artması ve ÖAKKY ile ilgili faaliyetlerden maddi gelir beklentisi gibi faktörlere dayanan bireysel motivasyonlar ise yazılımcıların ÖAKKY geliştirme için ne kadar zaman harcayacaklarının belirlenmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Buna göre, yazılımcının ÖAKKY geliştirme faaliyetleriyle ilgili bireysel motivasyonlarının yüksek olması, bu faaliyetlere ayrılan haftalık zamanı arttırmaktadır. Araştırmada sosyal motivasyonların böyle bir etkisine rastlanmamıştır.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhat Koloğlugil & Burcu Tekeş & Mercan Atalay, 2017. "Türkiye’de Özgür ve Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım Üretimi: Bireysel ve Sosyal Motivasyonların Karsılaştırmalı Analizi," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://yssr.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1628080975-tr.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2002. "Some Simple Economics of Open Source," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 197-234, June.
    2. Hertel, Guido & Niedner, Sven & Herrmann, Stefanie, 2003. "Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1159-1177, July.
    3. Bitzer, Jurgen & Schrettl, Wolfram & Schroder, Philipp J.H., 2007. "Intrinsic motivation in open source software development," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 160-169, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    2. Bitzer, Jürgen & Schröder, Philipp J.H., 2005. "The Impact of Entry and Competition by Open Source Software on Innovation," Working Papers 2005-12, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    3. Bitzer, Jürgen & Geishecker, Ingo, 2010. "Who contributes voluntarily to OSS? An investigation among German IT employees," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 165-172, February.
    4. David, Paul A. & Shapiro, Joseph S., 2008. "Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 364-398, December.
    5. Krishnamurthy, Sandeep & Ou, Shaosong & Tripathi, Arvind K., 2014. "Acceptance of monetary rewards in open source software development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 632-644.
    6. Bitzer, Jurgen & Schroder, Philipp J.H., 2005. "Bug-fixing and code-writing: The private provision of open source software," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 389-406, July.
    7. repec:old:wpaper:321 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Schulz, Celine, 2006. "The Secret to Successful User Communities: An Analysis of Computer Associates’ User Groups," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 1257, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    9. Jürgen Bitzer & Philipp J.H. Schröder, 2005. "The Impact of Entry and Competition by Open Source Software on Innovation Activity," Industrial Organization 0512001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Tuba Bakici & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2011. "Motives for Participation in On-Line Open Innovation Platforms," DRUID Working Papers 11-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    11. Juergen Bitzer & Ingo Geishecker & Philipp Schroeder, 2010. "Returns to Open Source Software Engagement: An Empirical Test of the Signaling Hypothesis," Working Papers V-321-10, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2010.
    12. repec:zbw:hohpro:321 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Egon Franck & Carola Jungwirth & Benno Luthiger, 2005. "Motivation und Engagement beim OSS-Programmieren- Eine empirische Analyse," Working Papers 0036, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU).
    14. Rullani, Francesco, 2005. "The three dimensions of a communitarian institution. The Open Source Software Community Case," AICCON Working Papers 16-2005, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    15. Stephen M. Maurer & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2006. "Open Source Software: The New Intellectual Property Paradigm," NBER Working Papers 12148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Bitzer, Jurgen, 2004. "Commercial versus open source software: the role of product heterogeneity in competition," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 369-381, December.
    17. Hinnosaar, Marit, 2019. "Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 262-276.
    18. Fabio M. Manenti & Stefano Comino & Marialaura Parisi, 2005. "From Planning to Mature: on the Determinants of Open Source Take-Off," Industrial Organization 0507006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Sep 2005.
    19. G. Parmentier & Vincent Mangematin, 2014. "Orchestrating innovation with user communities in the creative industries," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-00848861, HAL.
    20. Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2014. "Dynamics of Open Source Movements," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 294-316, June.
    21. Stam, Wouter, 2009. "When does community participation enhance the performance of open source software companies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1288-1299, October.
    22. Maha Shaikh & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2016. "Folding and Unfolding: Balancing Openness and Transparency in Open Source Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 813-833, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Özgür ve Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılım (ÖAKKY); Paylaşım Ekonomisi; Dijital EkonomiJournal: Yildiz Social Science Review;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Murat DONDURAN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibytutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.