IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v14y2016i144p1335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adoption of integrated reporting principles by the Romanian companies listed at the Bucharest Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana SOFIAN

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

This paper aims to identify a company with Romanian capital that has potential to implement the integrated reporting principles, with real benefits in attracting investors and/or building an international reputation. To achieve this goal, we performed a study on companies listed at the Bucharest Stock Exchange that operate in different sectors. We analysed the investment opportunity, the reports published currently by the companies and their compliance with the International Integrated Reporting Framework in the view of preparing an integrated report. The case study revealed a high potential for the implementation of integrated reporting within Antibiotice Ia?i S.A. As compared to all the selected companies, this company’s reporting practices are currently the most similar to the integrated reporting. However, for the other companies, the option to publish an integrated report is viable under certain conditions, particularly in order to build a business card that is internationally recognized and universally comparable.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana SOFIAN, 2016. "The adoption of integrated reporting principles by the Romanian companies listed at the Bucharest Stock Exchange," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(144), pages 1335-1335.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:144:p:1335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9517.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raluca Gina Guse & Alina Almasan & Cristina Circa & Madalina Dumitru, 2016. "The Role of the Stakeholders in the Institutionalization of the CSR Reporting In Romania," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 304-340, June.
    2. Madalina DUMITRU & Raluca-Gina GU?E, 2016. "Assurance Of Integrated Reports: The State Of The Art," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(134), pages 227-227, January.
    3. Robert G. Eccles & Michael P. Krzus & Jean Rogers & George Serafeim, 2012. "The Need for Sector-Specific Materiality and Sustainability Reporting Standards," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(2), pages 65-71, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Antonova & Ines Ruiz-Rosa & Javier Mendoza-Jimenez, 2022. "Water Resource Management in Hotels Using a Sustainable Balanced Scorecard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Bianca Alves Almeida Machado & Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias & Alberto Fonseca, 2021. "Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI‐based sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 570-580, March.
    3. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Schepis, Daniel, 2020. "Understanding Indigenous Reconciliation Action Plans from a corporate social responsibility perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Ruiz-Lozano, Mercedes & Tirado-Valencia, Pilar, 2016. "Do industrial companies respond to the guiding principles of the Integrated Reporting framework? A preliminary study on the first companies joined to the initiative," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 252-260.
    6. Edgley, Carla & Jones, Michael J. & Atkins, Jill, 2015. "The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-18.
    7. Dubravka Vlašić & Katarina Poldrugovac, 2022. "Non-Financial Information in Hotel Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Roberto Aprile & David Alexander & Federica Doni, 2023. "Enhancing the materiality principle in integrated reporting by adopting the General Systems Theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2219-2233, September.
    9. Jannik Gerwanski & Othar Kordsachia & Patrick Velte, 2019. "Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 750-770, July.
    10. Nadia Albu & Catalin Nicolae Albu & Madalina Dumitru & Valentin Florentin Dumitru, 2013. "Plurality or convergence in sustainability reporting standards?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 729-742, November.
    11. R. Rajesh & Chandrasekharan Rajendran, 2020. "Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1247-1267, March.
    12. Simone Pizzi & Francesco Rosati & Andrea Venturelli, 2021. "The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 404-421, January.
    13. Triantafyllos Papafloratos & Ioannis Markidis & Iordanis Kotzaivazoglou & Garyfallos Fragidis, 2023. "Sustainability Material Topics and Materiality Analysis in the Chemical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Vivek Pandey & Natalia Vidal & Rajat Panwar & Lubna Nafees, 2019. "Characterization of Sustainability Leaders and Laggards in the Global Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Raúl León & Aitor Salesa, 2024. "Is sustainability reporting disclosing what is relevant? Assessing materiality accuracy in the Spanish telecommunication industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21433-21460, August.
    16. Arthur Hughes & Michael A. Urban & Dariusz Wójcik, 2021. "Alternative ESG Ratings: How Technological Innovation Is Reshaping Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    18. Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Cristina Alexandrina ªtefãnescu & Gianluca Zanellato, 2019. "Encompassing Non-Financial Reporting in A Coercive Framework for Enhancing Social Responsibility: Romanian Listed Companies’ Case," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 590-590, August.
    19. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Kurniawan, Putu Sukma, 2018. "An Analysis of Information Materiality on Corporate Sustainability Report Using Information Materiality Map: A Review in Mining Industry in Indonesia," INA-Rxiv 7dzha, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Integrated reporting; Romania; value creation; listed companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:144:p:1335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.