IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v14y2016i144p1325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting standards that appeal to the professional

Author

Listed:
  • Alain BURLAUD

    (Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (Cnam), Paris)

  • Maria NICULESCU

    (Ecole Supérieure de la Francophonie pour l’Administration et le Management (ESFAM), Sofia)

Abstract

The international accounting standards (IFRSs and ISAs) rely increasingly more on the “professional judgment”. What is the situation in France and in Romania? After the conceptual clarifications, the article places the evolution of the professional judgment in the general movement of the law, which goes from “modernism” to “post-modernism” to become a law of specialists able to have a qualified opinion on highly technical subjects. In order to observe, in a scientific manner, this evolution of the accounting standards, we conducted a content analysis of principal legislative accounting texts, international and national (France and Romania), supplemented by a lexicometric analysis. These analyses allowed us to conclude that the importance of professional judgment in accounting standards is lower at the national level than it is at the international level. However, we highlight a number of dangers related to an increased use of professional judgment: loss of comparability and transparency, increased risks for accounting professionals including auditors, and significant discrepancies in the use of professional judgment in individual or consolidated accounts

Suggested Citation

  • Alain BURLAUD & Maria NICULESCU, 2016. "Accounting standards that appeal to the professional," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(144), pages 1325-1325.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:144:p:1325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9515.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "Réponse aux commentaires sur « Normalisation comptable internationale : le retour du politique ? »," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 17(3), pages 115-128.
    2. Alain Burlaud & Bernard Colasse, 2011. "Réponse aux commentaires sur "Normalisation comptable internationale : le retour du politique?"," Post-Print halshs-00665338, HAL.
    3. Tanja Lakovic & Jayne Fuglister, 2013. "The International Accounting Standards Board’s Progress in Promoting Judgement Through Objectives-Oriented Accounting Standards," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(7), pages 28-42, July.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5802 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Burlaud & Geneviève Causse, 2018. "Accounting: what balance is there between universality and contingency?," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(149), pages 1-89, February.
    2. Marc de Bourmont, 2014. "De l'évaluation des actifs et de la nécessité de développer des outils comptables de « l'après-crise »," Post-Print hal-01899199, HAL.
    3. Véronique Blum & Emmanuel Laffort, 2017. "From the quarrel of universal to the quarrel of accountants about Fair Value: the ongoing trap of individuation and problematization? [De la querella de los universales en la querella de la Valor J," Post-Print hal-03335977, HAL.
    4. Alain Burlaud & Maria Niculescu, 2016. "Accounting standards that appeal to the professional judgment: a threat or an opportunity for the accounting profession [Un drept contabil care face appel la raţionamentul profesional: o ameninţare," Post-Print halshs-02145487, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Professional judgment; accounting standards; accounting law; modern law; postmodern law.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:14:y:2016:i:144:p:1325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.