IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v8y2018i3p772-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations concerning the prohibition of use of the probation period in the individual labor contract (according to the provisions of article 33 of the Romanian Labor Code)

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Vidat

    (Law Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies; Lawyer, member of the Bucharest Bar Association, Romania)

Abstract

The probationary period is the most appropriate way of verifying the professional skills - among the possible ones - given that during the performance of the individual labor contract, the skills of the employee can be tested. The objective of this study is to analyze the ban on the use of the probation period in the context of art. 33 of the Labor Code. Thus, we propose to discuss relatively the employer's ability to employ probationers through successive employment in a maximum of 12 months. We appreciate that it is useful to establish the practical implications of the legal provisions outlined above - in the context in which the probationary period is the most useful way of prior checking of the persons applying for employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Vidat, 2018. "Considerations concerning the prohibition of use of the probation period in the individual labor contract (according to the provisions of article 33 of the Romanian Labor Code)," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 8(3), pages 772-778, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:772-778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An8v3/16.%20Vidat%20Ana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    individual employment contract; probation period; denial clause; verifying professional skills; successive hiring.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:772-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.