IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v7y2017i1p227-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative litigation systems in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Catalin-Silviu Sararu

    (Department of Law, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The article, analyzing the administrative litigation in the comparative law, groups the existing types of administrative litigation into four major systems, namely: a) States with administrative jurisdictions who have the State Council on top, administrative body with consultative and judicial role (the French system); b) States with administrative jurisdictions completely separated from the active and consultative administrations (the German system); c) States with administrative jurisdictions included in the judicial system; d) States with no administrative jurisdiction (English system). The administrative contentious systems analyzed have developed in line with historical evolution and legal traditions and have been continually adapted to the realities existing in each state. The manner in which the administrative contentious is regulated in a State reflects the degree of democratization of that country, the extent to which the citizen enjoys legal safeguards to defend himself against abuses by public authorities. The scientific novelty of this article is to capture the latest trends in the evolution of the administrative contentious systems analyzed. This study aims to provide an easy working tool for reforming administrative litigation on comparative law in states with young democracy. In the research we used the comparative method, the historical and the logical method.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin-Silviu Sararu, 2017. "Administrative litigation systems in Europe," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 227-235, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:227-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v1/19%20Sararu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dicey, Albert Venn, 1915. "Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 8, number dicey1915.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Licht Amir N., 2008. "Social Norms and the Law: Why Peoples Obey the Law," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 715-750, December.
    2. Åsbjørn Melkevik, 2016. "No progressive taxation without discrimination? On the generality of the law in the classical liberal tradition," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 418-434, December.
    3. James A. Dorn, 2014. "Equality, Justice, and Freedom: A Constitutional Perspective," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 34(3), pages 491-517, Fall.
    4. Harris, Jose, 2010. "Citizenship in Britain and Europe: some missing links in T.H. Marshall's theory of rights," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2010, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    5. Licht, Amir N. & Goldschmidt, Chanan & Schwartz, Shalom H., 2007. "Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 659-688, December.
    6. Menkes Jerzy, 2018. "Custom in International Economic Law," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 188-203, December.
    7. Bruce Yandle, 1993. "Sir Edward Coke and the struggle for a new constitutional order," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 263-285, March.
    8. James Dorn, 1991. "Madison's constitutional political economy: Principles for a liberal order," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 163-186, March.
    9. Shruti Rajagopalan, 2015. "Incompatible institutions: socialism versus constitutionalism in India," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 328-355, September.
    10. Adam Cygan, 2022. "Legislating for Brexit: ‘The People’ versus Parliament?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S2), pages 47-57, April.
    11. Shruti Rajagopalan & Richard Wagner, 2013. "Constitutional craftsmanship and the rule of law," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 295-309, December.
    12. Jennifer Huddleston, 2021. "Judicial engagement in classical Liberal public governance: a response and extension to Aligica, Boettke, and Tarko," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(3), pages 361-371, September.
    13. Matt Qvortrup, 2015. "New development: The courts and multi-level governance-some comparative perspectives on the emerging jurisprudence of the UK Supreme Court," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 57-61, January.
    14. James A. Dorn, 1990. "Introduction: Federalism and the Economic Order," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, Spring/Su.
    15. Lall B. Ramrattan & Michael Szenberg, 2017. "American Exceptionalism: An Appraisal—Political, Economic, Qualitative, and Quantitative," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 62(2), pages 222-246, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative litigation; comparative administrative law; judicial system; dualist law system; administrative jurisdictions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:227-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.