IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/ijefrr/2016p199-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting Manipulation Practices in Financial Statements: An Experience of an Asian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Madan Lal Bhasin

    (Professor, School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia)

Abstract

Accounting scandals and frauds are perennial; they have occurred in all eras, in all countries and affected millions of corporations. Unfortunately, there are few loopholes in accounting and auditing standards, which provide leeway and thus motivate accounting professionals to use aggressively manipulation practices. In fact, accounting manipulation (AM) involves the intentional cooking-up of financial records towards a pre-determined target. Every company indeed maneuvers the numbers, to a certain extent, as formally reported in its financial statements (FS) to achieve budgetary targets and generously reward senior managers. From Enron, WorldCom to Satyam, it appeared that window-dressing leading to AM is a serious problem that is increasing both in its frequency and severity, which undermines the integrity of financial reports and eroded investors’ confidence. The responsibility of preventing, detecting and investigating financial frauds rests squarely on Board of Directors and they should adopt preventive steps. Despite the raft of CG, and financial disclosure reforms, corporate accounting still remains murky and companies continue to find ways to play ‘hide-and-seek’ game with the system. Satyam computers were once the crown jewel of Indian IT-industry but were brought to the ground by its founders in 2009 as a result of financial manipulations in FS. The present study provides a snapshot of how Mr. Raju (CEO and Chairman) mastermind this maze of AM practices? Undoubtedly, Satyam scam is illegal and unethical in which computers were cleverly used to manipulate account books by creating fake invoices, inflating revenues, falsifying the cash and bank balances, showing non-existent interest on fixed deposits, showing ghost employees, and so on. Satyam fraud has shattered the dreams of investors, shocked the government and regulators and led to questioning of the accounting practices of auditors and CG norms in India. Finally, we recommend that “All types of AM practices should be legally recognized as a serious crime, and accounting bodies, law courts and regulatory authorities must adopt exemplary punitive measures to prevent such unethical practices.â€

Suggested Citation

  • Madan Lal Bhasin, 2016. "Accounting Manipulation Practices in Financial Statements: An Experience of an Asian Economy," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(11), pages 199-214, 11-2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:ijefrr:2016:p:199-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/ijefr2(11)199-214.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=5&month=11-2016&issue=11&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalpana Pai & Thomas D. Tolleson, 2015. "India’S Satyam Scandal: Evidence The Too Large To Indict Mindset Of Accounting Regulators Is A Global Phenomenon," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 35-43.
    2. Martono Anggusti & Bismar Nasution & Mahmul Siregar & Suhaidi & Tan Kamello & Benny Tabalujan & Hikmahanto Juwana, 2015. "Corporate Governance for Employee¡¯s Welfare," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(3), pages 257-266, May.
    3. ., 2015. "Corporate governance and financialization," Chapters, in: The Financialization of the Firm, chapter 4, pages 107-139, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Madan Lal Bhasin, 2016. "Creative Accounting Practices at Satyam Computers Limited: A Case Study of India’s Enron," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(6), pages 24-48, June.
    5. Judson Caskey & Volker Laux, 2017. "Corporate Governance, Accounting Conservatism, and Manipulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 424-437, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel Eneche Onoja & Odoma Ademu Usman, 2021. "Assessing the Effect of Tax Administration on Smes Tax Compliance Level in Kogi State," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, July-Dece.
    2. Umme Kulsoom Zaidi & Javaid Akhter & Asif Akhtar, 2018. "Window Dressing of Financial Statements in the Era of Digital Finance: A Study of Small Cap Indian Companies," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 67-75, December.
    3. Mahami, Zouleykha & Mouloudj, Kamel, 2020. "Factors Affecting Detection of Manipulation in Financial Statements: An Empirical Study from Auditors’ Perspective," MPRA Paper 108008, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Jun 2020.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khondaker Mizanur Rahman & Marc Bremer, 2016. "Effective Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting in Japan," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 12(Suppl. 1), pages 1-93–122.
    2. Madan Lal Bhasin, 2016. "Fraudulent Reporting Practices by Satyam," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 2(10(15)), pages 1.7-1.1.21, October.
    3. Subramaniam, Mohan & Iyer, Bala & Venkatraman, Venkat, 2019. "Competing in digital ecosystems," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 83-94.
    4. Harleman, Max & Weber, Jeremy G., 2017. "Natural resource ownership, financial gains, and governance: The case of unconventional gas development in the UK and the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 281-296.
    5. Brown, A. & Fishenden, Jerry & Thompson, M. & Venters, Will, 2017. "Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 73864, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Papaefthymiou, G. & Dragoon, Ken, 2016. "Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 69-82.
    7. Madan Lal Bhasin, 2016. "Satyam’s Manipulative Accounting Methodology Unveiled: An Experience of an Asian Economy," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(12), pages 35-54, December.
    8. Ibrahim Akoum, 2016. "Research, Development and Innovation in Malaysia: Elements of an Effective Growth Model," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(7), pages 390-403, July.
    9. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Sebastian Kronenberger & Volker Laux, 2022. "Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2349-2362, March.
    11. Laux, Volker & Ray, Korok, 2020. "Effects of accounting conservatism on investment efficiency and innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    12. Adalberto Rangone, 2016. "Corporate Psychology. How does Italian Entrepreneurship Change?," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 17-26, March.
    13. Abbas Ali Daryaei & Yasin Fattahi & Davood Askarany & Saeed Askary & Mahdad Mollazamani, 2022. "Accounting Comparability, Conservatism, Executive Compensation-Performance, and Information Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, October.
    14. Cui, Xin & Ma, Tingting & Xie, Xiaochen & Goodell, John W., 2023. "Uncertainty of uncertainty and accounting conservatism," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Ferdous, Lutfa Tilat & Atawnah, Nader & Yeboah, Richard & Zhou, Yifan, 2024. "Firm-level climate risk and accounting conservatism: International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    16. Henry L. Friedman & Mirko S. Heinle, 2016. "Lobbying and Uniform Disclosure Regulation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 863-893, June.
    17. Purwanto Purwanto & Isnain Bustaram & Subhan Subhan & Zef Risal, 2020. "The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Performance in Conventional and Islamic Banks: An Empirical Studies in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 1-6.
    18. C. S. Agnes Cheng & Xiaohui (Fiona) Li & Jing Xie & Yuxiang Zhong, 2023. "Accounting conservatism and common ownership by dedicated institutional blockholders," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(9-10), pages 1943-1983, October.
    19. Ha, Joohyung & Feng, Mingming, 2018. "Conditional conservatism and labor investment efficiency," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 143-163.
    20. Lu, Tong & Ruan, Lijun, 2024. "Coordination and Conservatism," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:ijefrr:2016:p:199-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=5&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.