IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/2004943446-451_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Outcome Evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program

Author

Listed:
  • Aseltine Jr., R.H.
  • DeMartino, R.

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the effectiveness of the Signs of Suicide (SOS) prevention program in reducing suicidal behavior. Methods. Twenty-one hundred students in 5 high schools in Columbus, Ga, and Hartford, Conn, were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Self-administered questionnaires were completed by students in both groups approximately 3 months after program implementation. Results. Significantly lower rates of suicide attempts and greater knowledge and more adaptive attitudes about depression and suicide were observed among students in the intervention group. The modest changes in knowledge and attitudes partially explained the beneficial effects of the program. Conclusions. SOS is the first school-based suicide prevention program to demonstrate significant reductions in self-reported suicide attempts.

Suggested Citation

  • Aseltine Jr., R.H. & DeMartino, R., 2004. "An Outcome Evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 446-451.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2004:94:3:446-451_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brann, Kristy L. & Baker, Derek & Smith-Millman, Mills K. & Watt, Sarah J. & DiOrio, Courtney, 2021. "A meta-analysis of suicide prevention programs for school-aged youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Emma Hamilton & Bonnie Klimes-Dougan, 2015. "Gender Differences in Suicide Prevention Responses: Implications for Adolescents Based on an Illustrative Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Denise Erbuto & Isabella Berardelli & Salvatore Sarubbi & Elena Rogante & Alice Sparagna & Gaia Nigrelli & David Lester & Marco Innamorati & Maurizio Pompili, 2021. "Suicide-Related Knowledge and Attitudes among a Sample of Mental Health Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.
    4. John Coleman & Daniel Hale & Richard Layard, 2011. "A Model for the Delivery of Evidence-Based PSHE (Personal Wellbeing) in Secondary Schools," CEP Discussion Papers dp1071, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. White, Jennifer & Morris, Jonathan, 2010. "Precarious spaces: Risk, responsibility and uncertainty in school-based suicide prevention programs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2187-2194, December.
    6. Gilda Gómez-Peresmitré & Romana Silvia Platas-Acevedo & Rodrigo León-Hernández & Gisela Pineda-García & Rebeca Guzmán-Saldaña, 2022. "Psychometric Assessment of an Online Self-Test Measuring Risky Eating Behavior, Depression, Social Anxiety, and Self-Injury in Mexican Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Sarah Keller & Vanessa McNeill & Tan Tran, 2021. "The Perceived Stigma Reduction Expressed by Young Adults in Response to Suicide Prevention Videos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Patricia Breux & Dana E. Boccio, 2019. "Improving Schools’ Readiness for Involvement in Suicide Prevention: An Evaluation of the Creating Suicide Safety in Schools (CSSS) Workshop," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Tanya Manchanda & Alan Stein & Mina Fazel, 2023. "Investigating the Role of Friendship Interventions on the Mental Health Outcomes of Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Range and a Systematic Review of Effectiveness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2004:94:3:446-451_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.