IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/200393152-56_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing health systems in four countries: Lessons for the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, L.D.

Abstract

The Rekindling Reform initiative examined the health systems of 4 countries: Canada, France, Germany, and Great Britain (United Kingdom). From the 4 country reports published in this issue of the American Journal of Public Health, 10 crosscutting themes emerge: (1) coverage, (2) funding, (3) costs, (4) providers, (5) integration, (6) markets, (7) analysis, (8) supply, (9) satisfaction, and (10) leadership. Lessons for the United States are presented under each point.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, L.D., 2003. "Comparing health systems in four countries: Lessons for the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(1), pages 52-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2003:93:1:52-56_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Megan A Pope & Ashok K Malla & Srividya N Iyer, 2018. "Who should be responsible for supporting individuals with mental health problems? A critical literature review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(3), pages 293-302, May.
    2. Takeda, Midori & Xie, Jun & Kurita, Kenichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2024. "Advancing Hospital Sustainability: A Multidimensional Index Integrating ESG and Digital Transformation," MPRA Paper 119930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Dauth, Christine, 2021. "The effects of private versus public health insurance on health and labor market outcomes," IAB-Discussion Paper 202103, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    4. Akinci, Fevzi & Mollahaliloğlu, Salih & Gürsöz, Hakki & Öğücü, Fatma, 2012. "Assessment of the Turkish health care system reforms: A stakeholder analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 21-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:2003:93:1:52-56_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.