IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999892171-175_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates

Author

Listed:
  • Fairbrother, G.
  • Hanson, K.L.
  • Friedman, S.
  • Butts, G.C.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on immunization coverage of 3 incentives for physicians - a cash bonus for practice-wide increases, enhanced fee for service, and feedback. Methods. Incentives were applied at 4-month intervals over 1 year among 60 inner-city office-based pediatricians. At each interval, charts of 50 randomly selected children between 3 and 35 months of age were reviewed per physician. Results. The percentage of children who were up to date for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b; polio; and measles-mumps- rubella immunization in the study's bonus group improved by 25.3 percentage points (P

Suggested Citation

  • Fairbrother, G. & Hanson, K.L. & Friedman, S. & Butts, G.C., 1999. "The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(2), pages 171-175.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:2:171-175_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodriguez, Marisol & Scheffler, Richard M. & Agnew, Jonathan D., 2000. "An update on Spain's health care system: is it time for managed competition?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 109-131, March.
    2. Claudia Keser & Emmanuel Peterlé & Cornelius Schnitzler, 2014. "Money talks - Paying physicians for performance," CIRANO Working Papers 2014s-41, CIRANO.
    3. Grant Miller & Kimberly Singer Babiarz, 2013. "Pay-for-Performance Incentives in Low- and Middle-Income Country Health Programs," NBER Working Papers 18932, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Merilind, Eero & Salupere, Rauno & Västra, Katrin & Kalda, Ruth, 2015. "The influence of performance-based payment on childhood immunisation coverage," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 770-777.
    5. Malik, Amyn A. & Ahmed, Noureen & Shafiq, Mehr & Elharake, Jad A. & James, Erin & Nyhan, Kate & Paintsil, Elliott & Melchinger, Hannah Camille & Team, Yale Behavioral Interventions & Malik, Fauzia A. , 2023. "Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Kauhanen, Antti & Salmi, Julia & Torkki, Paulus, 2013. "Performance Measurement in Healthcare Incentive Plans," ETLA Working Papers 18, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2014. "Physician Response To Pay‐For‐Performance: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(8), pages 962-978, August.
    8. Hasnain, Zahid & Manning, Nick & Pierskalla Henryk, 2012. "Performance-related pay in the public sector : a review of theory and evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6043, The World Bank.
    9. Singh, Prakarsh & Masters, William A., 2017. "Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment with Anganwadi workers in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 219-231.
    10. Barber, Sarah L. & Gertler, Paul J., 2008. "Strategies that promote high quality care in Indonesia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 339-347, December.
    11. Lin, Tzu-Yu & Chen, Chia-Yu & Huang, Yu Tang & Ting, Ming-Kuo & Huang, Jui-Chu & Hsu, Kuang-Hung, 2016. "The effectiveness of a pay for performance program on diabetes care in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based longitudinal study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1313-1321.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:2:171-175_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.