IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199989101564-1566_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retail trade incentives: How tobacco industry practices compare with those of other industries

Author

Listed:
  • Feighery, E.C.
  • Ribisl, K.M.
  • Achabal, D.D.
  • Tyebjee, T.

Abstract

Objectives. This study compared the incentive payments for premium shelf space and discounts on volume purchases paid to retailers by 5 types of companies. Methods. Merchants were interviewed at 108 randomly selected small retail outlets that sell tobacco in Santa Clara County, California. Results. Significantly more retailers reported receiving slotting/display allowances for tobacco (62.4%) than for any other product type. An average store participating in a retailer incentive program received approximately $3157 annually from all sampled product types, of which approximately $2462 (78%) came from tobacco companies. Conclusions. Future research should assess the impact of tobacco industry incentive programs on the in-store marketing and sales practices of retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Feighery, E.C. & Ribisl, K.M. & Achabal, D.D. & Tyebjee, T., 1999. "Retail trade incentives: How tobacco industry practices compare with those of other industries," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(10), pages 1564-1566.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:10:1564-1566_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melik Karabiyikoglu, 2012. "Bonus and Rebate: Perception of Exclusive GSM Dealers and Their Salesmen in Turkey," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 2(3), pages 192-198.
    2. Adam D. Rennhoff, 2004. "Paying For Shelf Space: An Investigation Of Merchandising Allowances In The Grocery Industry," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 084, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    3. Rennhoff, Adam D., 2004. "Paying For Shelf Space: An Investigation Of Merchandising Allowances In The Grocery Industry," Research Reports 25155, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    4. Laska, Melissa N. & Sindberg, Lesley Schmidt & Ayala, Guadalupe X. & D'Angelo, Heather & Horton, Lucy A. & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Kharmats, Anna & Olson, Christina & Gittelsohn, Joel, 2018. "Agreements between small food store retailers and their suppliers: Incentivizing unhealthy foods and beverages in four urban settings," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 324-330.
    5. Rennhoff Adam, 2008. "Paying for Shelf Space: An Investigation of Merchandising Allowances in the Grocery Industry," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-40, October.
    6. Benjamin Klein & Joshua D. Wright, 2007. "The Economics of Slotting Contracts," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(3), pages 421-454.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:10:1564-1566_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.