IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199484111791-1795_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disability determinations for adults with mental disorders: Social Security Administration vs independent judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Okpaku, S.O.
  • Sibulkin, A.E.
  • Schenzler, C.

Abstract

Objectives. Disability determinations made by the Disability Determination Service for Social Security Administration (SSA) disability claims due to mental impairment were compared with the independent judgments of a team of mental health workers. The decisions of the Service and the team's agreement with those decisions were predicted from a set of explanatory variables. Methods. One hundred fifty-eight adult applicants for or beneficiaries of SSA benefit programs participated. The team used SSA disability criteria to judge disability based on in-depth interviews. Results. Team members voted yes, no, or maybe regarding approval for disability. Of the cases approved by the team, 89% were actually allowed by the Disability Determination Service. However, the team could not reach a yes or no decision for almost half of the subjects, contributing to a total agreement with the Service on only 40% of the cases. Conclusions. Sufficient evidence exists to question the reliability of SSA disability determinations for mental disorders. Although the Disability Determination Service decision for mental impairments can be predicted above chance, a direct test of the reliability of such determinations should be conducted, with particular attention to the effect of the quality of the medical information.

Suggested Citation

  • Okpaku, S.O. & Sibulkin, A.E. & Schenzler, C., 1994. "Disability determinations for adults with mental disorders: Social Security Administration vs independent judgments," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(11), pages 1791-1795.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1791-1795_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary Frost-Gaskin & Rory O'Kelly & Claire Henderson & Richard Pacitti, 2003. "A Welfare Benefits Outreach Project to Users of Community Mental Health Services," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 49(4), pages 251-263, December.
    2. Carolyn S Dewa & Hiske Hees & Lucy Trojanowski & Aart H Schene, 2015. "Clinician Experiences Assessing Work Disability Related to Mental Disorders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1994:84:11:1791-1795_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.