IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1993834588-590_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic x-ray exposure and lens opacities: The Beaver Dam Eye Study

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, B.E.K.
  • Klein, R.
  • Linton, K.L.P.
  • Franke, T.

Abstract

The Beaver Dam Eye Study is a population-based study of common age- related eye diseases. During the standardized medical history, the 4926 subjects were asked whether they had ever had a chest x-ray, computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan of the head, other x-rays of the head, x-rays of the abdomen, or other diagnostic x-rays. The eye examination included photographs of the lenses of the eyes, which were subsequently graded according to protocol. Nuclear sclerosis and posterior subcapsular opacity were significantly associated with CAT scans. If these relationships are causal, it would highlight the importance of minimizing such exposure to the lens of the eye.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, B.E.K. & Klein, R. & Linton, K.L.P. & Franke, T., 1993. "Diagnostic x-ray exposure and lens opacities: The Beaver Dam Eye Study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(4), pages 588-590.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:588-590_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai-Lun Cheng & Jing-Yang Huang & Jui-Hung Weng & Jeng-Yuan Chiou & Chyn-Tair Lan & Kwong-Chung Tung, 2022. "18F-FDG PET/CT Did Not Increase the Risk of Cataract Occurrence in Oncology Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1993:83:4:588-590_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.