IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1984749979-983_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use

Author

Listed:
  • Fink, A.
  • Kosecoff, J.
  • Chassin, M.
  • Brook, R.H.

Abstract

Consensus methods are being used increasingly to solve problems in medicine and health. Their main purpose is to define levels of agreement on controversial subjects. Advocates suggest that, when properly employed, consensus strategies can create structured environments in which experts are given the best available information, allowing their solutions to problems to be more justifiable and credible than otherwise. This paper surveys the characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) and provides guidelines for those who want to use the techniques. Among the concerns these guidelines address are selecting problems, choosing members for consensus panels, specifying acceptable levels of agreement, properly using empirical data, obtaining professional and political support, and disseminating results.

Suggested Citation

  • Fink, A. & Kosecoff, J. & Chassin, M. & Brook, R.H., 1984. "Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(9), pages 979-983.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:9:979-983_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Colagiuri & Sinead Boylan & Emily Morrice, 2015. "Research Priorities for NCD Prevention and Climate Change: An International Delphi Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Otto H. Swank & Bauke Visser, 2015. "Learning from Others? Decision Rights, Strategic Communication, and Reputational Concerns," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 109-149, November.
    3. Abdul Talib Hashim & Azli Ariffin & Abdul Razalli & Abd Aziz Shukor & Mohd Nizamnasrifan & Abu Bakar Yusof, 2016. "Nominal Group Technique: a Brainstorming Tool for Identifying Learning Activities Using Musical Instruments to Enhance Creativity and Imagination of Young Children," European Journal of Language and Literature Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    4. Justus N Agumba, 2015. "Validating and Identifying Health and Safety Performance Improvement Indicators: Experience of Using Delphi Technique," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 14-22.
    5. Otto H. Swank & Bauke Visser, 2009. "Decision Making and Learning in a Globalizing World," Economics Working Papers ECO2009/20, European University Institute.
    6. Sharon Barak & Tzlil Rabinovitz & Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak & Rony Schenker & Lian Meiry & Riki Tesler, 2022. "An Individually Tailored Program to Increase Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors among the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Gabel, Matthew J. & Shipan, Charles R., 2004. "A social choice approach to expert consensus panels," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 543-564, May.
    8. Mitra Hannani & Marc Bascompta & Mojtaba Gerami Sabzevar & Hesam Dehghani & Ali Asghar Khajevandi, 2023. "Causal Analysis of Safety Risk Perception of Iranian Coal Mining Workers Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Shannon Li & Anne Honey & Francesca Coniglio & Peter Schaecken, 2022. "Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Elisabeta Ioana Hiriscau & Nicola Stingelin-Giles & Danuta Wasserman & Stella Reiter-Theil, 2016. "Identifying Ethical Issues in Mental Health Research with Minors Adolescents: Results of a Delphi Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    12. Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron & Hélène Fron Chabouis & Pierre Durieux & Jean-Pierre Attal & Michèle Muller-Bolla & Frédéric Courson, 2013. "Development of a Core Set of Outcomes for Randomized Controlled Trials with Multiple Outcomes – Example of Pulp Treatments of Primary Teeth for Extensive Decay in Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    13. Shani, Segev & Siebzehner, Miriam Ines & Luxenburg, Osnat & Shemer, Joshua, 2000. "Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-185, December.
    14. West, Allison & Duggan, Anne K. & Gruss, Kelsey & Minkovitz, Cynthia S., 2018. "Creating a measurement framework for service coordination in maternal and early childhood home visiting: An evidence-informed, expert process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 289-297.
    15. Dana Hübelová & Martina Kuncová & Hana Vojáčková & Jitka Coufalová & Alice Kozumplíková & Francois Stefanus Lategan & Beatrice-Elena Chromková Manea, 2021. "Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Caleb Chidozie Chinedu & Atif Saleem & Wan Hanim Nadrah Wan Muda, 2023. "Teaching and Learning Approaches: Curriculum Framework for Sustainability Literacy for Technical and Vocational Teacher Training Programmes in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Ravonne A. Green, 2014. "The Delphi Technique in Educational Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
    18. Sara McQuinn & Marie Delnord & Mary Rose Sweeney & Anthony Staines, 2020. "Making the Lives of Children and Young People More Visible in Europe. Consensus on Child and Young People’s Health and Well-Being Indicators for Europe: A Delphi Process," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(3), pages 951-966, June.
    19. Hiram Ting & Winnie Wong & Ernest Run, 2016. "Complaint Behaviour between Generations and Its Transmissions: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(11), pages 279-279, October.
    20. Sundmacher, Leonie & Fischbach, Diana & Schuettig, Wiebke & Naumann, Christoph & Augustin, Uta & Faisst, Cristina, 2015. "Which hospitalisations are ambulatory care-sensitive, to what degree, and how could the rates be reduced? Results of a group consensus study in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1415-1423.
    21. Derek Stewart & Kathrine Gibson-Smith & Katie MacLure & Alpana Mair & Albert Alonso & Carles Codina & Antonio Cittadini & Fernando Fernandez-Llimos & Glenda Fleming & Dimitra Gennimata & Ulrika Gilles, 2017. "A modified Delphi study to determine the level of consensus across the European Union on the structures, processes and desired outcomes of the management of polypharmacy in older people," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:9:979-983_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.