IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2014.302191_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of the epidemiology of nonfatal strangulation, a human rights and health concern

Author

Listed:
  • Sorenson, S.B.
  • Joshi, M.
  • Sivitz, E.

Abstract

We reviewed the literature on the epidemiology of nonfatal strangulation (also, albeit incorrectly, called choking) by an intimate partner. We searched 6 electronic databases to identify cross-sectional, primary research studies from 1960 to 2014 that reported national prevalence estimates of nonfatal strangulation by an intimate partner among community-residing adults. Of 7260 identified references, 23 articles based on 11 self-reported surveys in 9 countries met the inclusion criteria. The percentage of women who reported ever having been strangled by an intimate partner ranged from 3.0% to 9.7%; past-year prevalence ranged from 0.4% to 2.4%, with 1.0% being typical. Althoughmanyepidemiological surveys inquire about strangulation, evidence regarding its prevalence is scarce. Modifying or adding a question to ongoing national surveys, particularly the Demographic and Health Surveys, would remedy the lack of data for low- and middle-income countries. In addition, when questions about strangulation are asked, findings should be reported rather than only combined with other questions to form broader categories (e.g., severe violence). Such action is merited because of the multiple negative short- and long-term sequelae of strangulation. © 2014, American Public Health Association Inc. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorenson, S.B. & Joshi, M. & Sivitz, E., 2014. "A systematic review of the epidemiology of nonfatal strangulation, a human rights and health concern," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(11), pages 54-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302191_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302191
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofia Neves & Emília Silva & Joana Topa & Janete Borges & Alice Pereira & Estefânia Silva, 2022. "Death Threats and Attempted Femicide in the Context of Domestic Violence in Portugal," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.302191_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.