IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2008.133694_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using seminar blogs to enhance student participation and learning in public health school classes

Author

Listed:
  • Goldman, R.H.
  • Cohen, A.P.
  • Sheahan, F.

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated whether "seminar blogs" enhanced learning in a large graduate-level introductory public health school class. Methods. Sixty students were divided into 6 online blog groups. Students posted their assignments (case analyses, news commentaries), prompting comments from other students. Anonymous poll surveys of students were conducted at midpoint and at the end of the course. Results. Sixty percent reported that blog participation enriched their learning quite a bit, 34% a small amount, and 6% not at all; 54% said that the blogs provided opportunities to learn from classmates. When comparing writing on the blog to speaking in class, 60% found it easier, 30% about the same, and 10% harder. About 65% said that skills attained by participating in blogs were useful for current or future work. Major criticisms involved time issues. Conclusions. Small seminar blogs offer opportunities for increased student participation, interaction, and learning. To be most effective and appealing, assignments for postings need to allow sufficient time for commentary. This educational technology has potential to expand the classroom experience and is worthy of further development and testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Goldman, R.H. & Cohen, A.P. & Sheahan, F., 2008. "Using seminar blogs to enhance student participation and learning in public health school classes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(9), pages 1658-1663.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.133694_8
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.133694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2008.133694
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2008.133694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hajar Kashani & Rosnaini Binti Mahmud & Seyed Ali Rezvani Kalajahi, 2013. "Comparing the Effect of Blogging as well as Pen-and-Paper on the Essay Writing Performance of Iranian Graduate Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(10), pages 202-202, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2008.133694_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.