IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2022i3p65-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing innovation for sustainability in public administration: the challenges of capacity-building

Author

Listed:
  • Florina Pînzaru
  • Adina Săniuță
  • Bianca Roxana Sălăgeanu

Abstract

There is a continuous discussion on the role of public administration and on how its management should be structured to meet current societal expectations, such as adopting sustainability. More than a trend, sustainability seems to have become the new absolute necessity of any management strategy and organizational statement. Business enterprises seem to be one step in advance in terms of adopting sustainability, especially with the rise of the ESG criteria implemented mainly by companies. Public sector entities also seem to follow the same path but with less evident speed and visibility. Based on a semi-structured narrative literature review approach, this opinion paper addresses the complexity of public administration capacity building to adopt sustainability through innovation by emphasizing the interdependencies between leadership, orientation towards innovation, values, and organizational challenges. The authors identify barriers and opportunities in adopting sustainability by public administration and propose an empirical capacity-building model for public institutions oriented toward sustainability through innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Florina Pînzaru & Adina Săniuță & Bianca Roxana Sălăgeanu, 2022. "Managing innovation for sustainability in public administration: the challenges of capacity-building," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 65-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2022:i:3:p:65-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-155322-82218
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis Meuleman, 2021. "Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Oksana Seroka‐Stolka & Kamil Fijorek, 2020. "Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Proactive environmental strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of firm size," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2338-2354, September.
    3. Gopalakrishnan, S. & Damanpour, F., 1997. "A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 15-28, February.
    4. Tracy Van Holt & Matt Statler & Ulrich Atz & Tensie Whelan & Mara van Loggerenberg & James Cebulla, 2020. "The cultural consensus of sustainability‐driven innovation: Strategies for success," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3399-3409, December.
    5. Jan Fagerberg, 2018. "Mission (im)possible? The role of innovation (and innovation policy) in supporting structural change & sustainability transitions," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20180216, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    6. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    7. Florina Pinzaru & Alina Mihaela Dima & Alexandra Zbuchea & Zoltan Veres, 2022. "Adopting Sustainability and Digital Transformation in Business in Romania: A Multifaceted Approach in the Context of the Just Transition," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 1-28.
    8. Wayne Visser, 2018. "Creating Integrated Value Through Sustainable Innovation: A Conceptual Framework," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Lars Moratis & Frans Melissen & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Sustainable Business Models, chapter 0, pages 129-150, Springer.
    9. Haas, Peter M., 2017. "The epistemic authority of solution-oriented global environmental assessments," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 221-224.
    10. Isabel Marques & João Leitão & Alba Carvalho & Dina Pereira, 2021. "Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Sarkar, Soumodip & Pansera, Mario, 2017. "Sustainability-driven innovation at the bottom: Insights from grassroots ecopreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 327-338.
    12. Allan Kaplan, 2000. "Capacity building: Shifting the paradigms of practice," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3-4), pages 517-526, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Kotsemir & Alexander Abroskin & Dirk Meissner, 2013. "Innovation concepts and typology – an evolutionary discussion," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Rosselyn Pacheco & Elizabete Monteiro & Carolina Santos, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Dalia Streimikiene & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Drivers of Proactive Environmental Strategies: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry of Asian Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Cuevas-Romo, Ana & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Díaz-Acevedo, Natalie & Albores, Pavel & Despoudi, Stella & Malesios, Chrisovalantis & Dey, Prasanta, 2022. "The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Fleiter, Tobias & Hirzel, Simon & Worrell, Ernst, 2012. "The characteristics of energy-efficiency measures – a neglected dimension," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 502-513.
    6. Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Kai Hockerts, 2011. "The greening dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 394-407, September.
    7. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    9. Zhu, Zhaohui & Tan, Yafei, 2022. "Can green industrial policy promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-75.
    10. Christopher F. Baum & Arash Kordestani & Dorothea Schäfer & Andreas Stephan, 2021. "Firms in Green Public Procurement: Financial Strength Indicators’ Impact on Contract Awards and Its Repercussion on Financial Strength," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 90(4), pages 71-92.
    11. Paul Stefan MARKOVITS, 2024. "Assesing Romanian Farmers’ Motivation For Digitalization: A Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Usage Of Technology (Utaut) Based Research Model," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 98-112, March.
    12. Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Marival & Trull-Domínguez, Óscar & Sánchez-Planelles, Joaquín, 2022. "Exposing the ideal combination of endogenous–exogenous drivers for companies’ ecoinnovative orientation: Results from machine-learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Bobulescu, Roxana & Fritscheova, Aneta, 2021. "Convivial innovation in sustainable communities: Four cases in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    14. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Hille, Erik & Althammer, Wilhelm & Diederich, Henning, 2020. "Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: Does the policy instrument matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Liguo, Xin & Ahmad, Manzoor & Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal, 2022. "Impact of innovation in marine energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Yıldırım, Durmuş Çağrı & Esen, Ömer & Yıldırım, Seda, 2022. "The nonlinear effects of environmental innovation on energy sector-based carbon dioxide emissions in OECD countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Wadim Strielkowski & Irina Firsova & Svetlana Azarova & Irina Shatskaya, 2022. "Novel Insights in the Leadership in Business and Economics: A Post-Coronavirus Update," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Jolanta Pakulska, 2021. "The Eco-Innovation versus Economic Development on the EU Example," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 999-1008.
    20. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2022:i:3:p:65-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.