IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2015i1p61-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kryterium Ryzyka W Organizacji „Zwinnej”

Author

Listed:
  • Wioletta WEREDA
  • Jacek Woźniak

Abstract

Organizacja „zwinna” traktowana jest jako jeden ze współczesnych podstawowych modeli kształtowania i doskonalenia organizacji. Fundamentem budowania „zwinnego” zarządzania w organizacji jest proces kreowania i dyfuzji wiedzy. Wiedza stanowi bowiem swoistą „dźwignię” rozwoju organizacji i źródło jej szeroko rozumianego potencjału. „Zwinność” organizacji wyrasta z procesów zarządzania wiedzą i przejawia się m.in. w adaptacyjności tej organizacji do endo- i egzogenicznych zmian. Model „zwinnej” organizacji wymaga również uwzględniania kryterium ryzyka. W organizacjach „zwinnych” ryzyko traktuje się przede wszystkim jako źródło szans dla organizacji, a nie zagrożeń. Artykuł ma charakter teoretyczno-empiryczny, a jego celem jest umiejscowienie kryterium ryzyka w modelu organizacji „zwinnej”, jak również określenie roli i znaczenia tego kryterium w kształtowaniu jej rozwoju. Przykładem organizacji „zwinnej”, w rozwoju której kryterium ryzyka odgrywa znaczącą rolę, jest firma McDonald’s. Działając w skali globalnej i stosując strategię dywersyfikacji poziomej, odnotowuje ona szereg zróżnicowanych czynników, jakie determinują jej funkcjonowanie. Można przyjąć nawet, że McDonald’s działa w swoistej „sieci” czynników ryzyka (tj. czynników szans/korzyści i czynników zagrożeń/strat). Firma ta wykorzystuje kryterium ryzyka do kreowania swojego potencjału, stosując m.in. zintegrowane podejście do zarządzania ryzykiem (bazujące na podejściu systemowym) oraz strategię ekspansji międzynarodowej, tj. uwzględniając zróżnicowanie poszczególnych rynków (a więc i czynników ryzyka) i dostosowując się do ich potrzeb, wymagań i możliwości – co z kolei jest przejawem elastyczności i adaptacyjności.

Suggested Citation

  • Wioletta WEREDA & Jacek Woźniak, 2015. "Kryterium Ryzyka W Organizacji „Zwinnej”," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 61-87.
  • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2015:i:1:p:61-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-129352-56404
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yusuf, Y. Y. & Sarhadi, M. & Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 33-43, May.
    2. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Effect of Organizational Agility on Quality of Work Life: A Study on Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 271-271, May.
    2. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    3. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    5. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    6. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    7. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.
    8. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    9. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 296-296, April.
    10. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2017. "Job Engagement as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Agility and Organizational Performance: A Study on Teaching Hospitals in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 223-240, October.
    11. Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo & Sepideh Saghafi, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of Using Knowledge Management on Organisational Agility through Competitive Intelligence and Strategic Thinking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Shuxin Zhang & Sid Suntrayuth, 2024. "The Synergy of Ambidextrous Leadership, Agility, and Entrepreneurial Orientation to Achieve Sustainable AI Product Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Improve Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 97-111, March.
    14. Saeid Homayoun & Mahdi Salehi & AmirHossein ArminKia & Vesna Novakovic, 2024. "The Mediating Effect of Innovative Performance on the Relationship Between the Use of Information Technology and Organizational Agility in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Sanjai Kumar Shukla & Sushil & Manoj Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 349-370, December.
    16. Umer Muhammad & Tahira Nazir & Najam Muhammad & Ahsen Maqsoom & Samina Nawab & Syeda Tamkeen Fatima & Khuram Shafi & Faisal Shafique Butt, 2021. "Impact of agile management on project performance: Evidence from I.T sector of Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Role of Organizational Agility in Enhancing Organizational Excellence: A Study on Telecommunications Sector in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 121-121, March.
    18. Raschke, Robyn L., 2010. "Process-based view of agility: The value contribution of IT and the effects on process outcomes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 297-313.
    19. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "The Role of Organizational Agility in Reinforcing Job Engagement: A Study on Industrial Companies in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 153-167, February.
    20. Roberts, Nicholas & Grover, Varun, 2012. "Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 579-585.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2015:i:1:p:61-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.