IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoq/ekonom/y2024i1p24-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation of the interlinkages between green growth dimensions, the energy trilemma, and sustainable development goals: Evidence from G7 and E7 economies

Author

Listed:
  • Lejla Terzić

Abstract

Green growth dimensions, the energy trilemma, and accomplishing sustainable development goals have recently emerged as crucial topics in modern economics. This article examines the significance of green growth dimensions and the energy trilemma for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs), as well as the effectiveness of the measures of green growth and the green energy transition in the G7 and E7 economies. The research was conducted by employing a range of methodological assessment instruments. This study contributes to our existing knowledge by highlighting the importance of green growth dimensions, the energy trilemma, and SDGs by exploring the interlinkages among the crucial indicators in the G7 and E7 economies. The results could be of assistance to policymakers, governments, and legislators. The diversity in rating positions between significant variables is the basis for the future approval of green and energy policies in G7 and E7 economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lejla Terzić, 2024. "An investigation of the interlinkages between green growth dimensions, the energy trilemma, and sustainable development goals: Evidence from G7 and E7 economies," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 24-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2024:i:1:p:24-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ekonomista.pte.pl/pdf-183586-107530
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Mariana Mazzucato & Dirk Messner & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Johan Rockström, 2019. "Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 805-814, September.
    2. Tian, Jinfang & Yu, Longguang & Xue, Rui & Zhuang, Shan & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-COVID-19 era," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    3. Jeannie Oliver & Benjamin Sovacool, 2017. "The Energy Trilemma and the Smart Grid: Implications Beyond the United States," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 70-84, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoxia Liang & Yi Shi & Yan Li, 2023. "Research on the Yellow River Basin Energy Structure Transformation Path under the “Double Carbon” Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zheng, Shuxian & Zhou, Xuanru & Tan, Zhanglu & Liu, Chan & Hu, Han & Yuan, Hui & Peng, Shengnan & Cai, Xiaomei, 2023. "Assessment of the global energy transition: Based on trade embodied energy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Zuo, Yun & Zhi, Kangquan & Pei, Yingshun & Zhuang, Wencan & Chen, Yanhua, 2023. "Combining the role of natural resources development and trade openness on economic growth: New evidence from linear and asymmetric analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Lan Yang & Kathryn Cormican, 2021. "The Crossovers and Connectivity between Systems Engineering and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Scoping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Lei, Yu-Tian & Ma, Chao-Qun & Mirza, Nawazish & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Narayan, Seema Wati & Chen, Xun-Qi, 2022. "A renewable energy microgrids trading management platform based on permissioned blockchain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Velasco-Herrejón, Paola & Bauwens, Thomas & Calisto Friant, Martin, 2022. "Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Chi Zhang & Zhongchang Sun & Qiang Xing & Jialong Sun & Tianyu Xia & Hao Yu, 2021. "Localizing Indicators of SDG11 for an Integrated Assessment of Urban Sustainability—A Case Study of Hainan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Sonika Redhu & Pragati Jain, 2024. "Unveiling the nexus between water scarcity and socioeconomic development in the water-scarce countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19557-19577, August.
    9. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Ahmed, Gaffer & Kishore, Nanda, 2024. "Synergistic effects on properties of biofuel and biochar produced through co-feed pyrolysis of Erythrina indica and Azadirachta indica biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Johanna Karolina Louise Koehler, 2023. "Not all risks are equal: a risk governance framework for assessing the water SDG," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 179-189, June.
    12. Carlos Santos-Iglesia & Pablo Fernández-Arias & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Diego Vergara, 2022. "Energy Consumption of the Urban Transport Fleet in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Ávila (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    15. Dong, Xianjing & Zhang, Xiaojuan & Zhang, Congcong & Bi, Chunyu, 2023. "Building sustainability education for green recovery in the energy resource sector: A cross country analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Ancín, María & Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2022. "New trends in the global digital transformation process of the agri-food sector: An exploratory study based on Twitter," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Broccardo, Laura & Truant, Elisa & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2023. "The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Lutz Sager, 2023. "Global air quality inequality over 2000-2020," Papers 2307.15669, arXiv.org.
    19. Róbert Csalódi & Tímea Czvetkó & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of Energy Transition Paths and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Shi, Zhongtuo & Yao, Wei & Zhao, Yifan & Ai, Xiaomeng & Wen, Jinyu & Cheng, Shijie, 2024. "Two-stage weakly supervised learning to mitigate label noise for intelligent identification of power system dominant instability mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable development goals (SDGs); investigation of interlinkages; green growth dimensions; energy trilemma; G7 and E7 economies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2024:i:1:p:24-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomasz Kwarcinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pteeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.