IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoq/ekonom/y2021i2p39-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Strategies of Polish Manufacturing Companies through the Business Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • JAGODA KASZOWSKA-MOJSA

Abstract

The paper analyses the differentiation of innovation activities and strategies of Polish manufacturing companies during economic expansions (2004–2008 and 2013–2014) and slowdowns (2009–2013) of the Polish economy. The research is based on the data from five databases of the Central Statistical Office, which overlap with the Community Innovation Survey (CIS). It is found that because companies are heterogeneous in their innovation resources, they also differ in the continuity of the innovation activities and strategies that they introduce. Some of them – persistent innovators – innovate continuously, while others – occasional innovators – innovate from time to time, most often during an economic upswing. There is also a group of challengers that initiate innovation activities irrespective of a slowdown. Although existing theories propose that research and development and, in more general terms, innovation activities are concentrated when output is low, aggregate data for many developed economies repeatedly show their procyclicality. In the paper, the author shows that it is possible to distinguish subgroups of Polish manufacturing companies whose innovation activity is procyclical and those in which this activity is countercyclical. Expenditures on R&D, machinery and technical equipment, technology and marketing as well as the commercialisation of innovations also differ across groups. Due to strong heterogeneity of the whole sample, the results of aggregate analyses may be misleading. The policies that support innovation in Poland should take this heterogeneity into account. It is also highly recommended that the needs of persistent innovators, occasional innovators and challengers be reassessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagoda Kaszowska-Mojsa, 2021. "Innovation Strategies of Polish Manufacturing Companies through the Business Cycle," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 39-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2021:i:2:p:39-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ekonomista.pte.pl/pdf-150122-75845
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide Antonioli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Paolo Pini, 2011. "Innovation, industrial relations and employee outcomes: evidence from Italy," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(1), pages 66-90, January.
    2. Llerena, Patrick & Oltra, Vanessa, 2002. "Diversity of innovative strategy as a source of technological performance," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 179-201, June.
    3. Leiponen, Aija & Drejer, Ina, 2007. "What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1221-1238, October.
    4. A. Colin Cameron & Pravin K. Trivedi, 2010. "Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number musr, March.
    5. repec:fth:harver:1473 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mariana Mazzucato, 2013. "Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(4), pages 851-867, August.
    7. Michael Peneder, 2003. "Industry Classifications: Aim, Scope and Techniques," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 109-129, March.
    8. Correa, Paulo & Iootty, Mariana, 2010. "Will the crisis affect the economic recovery in eastern European countries ? evidence from firm level data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5278, The World Bank.
    9. Kira R. Fabrizio & Ulya Tsolmon, 2014. "An Empirical Examination of the Procyclicality of R&D Investment and Innovation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(4), pages 662-675, October.
    10. Davide Antonioli & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Paolo Pini, 2011. "Innovation, industrial relations and employee outcomes: evidence from Italy," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(1), pages 66-90, January.
    11. Pavitt, Keith, 1984. "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 343-373, December.
    12. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Marsili, Orietta, 2006. "The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 213-229, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jagoda Kaszowska-Mojsa, 2021. "Innovation Strategies of Polish Manufacturing Companies through the Business Cycle," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, vol. 2, pages 39-65, April.
    2. Peneder, Michael, 2010. "Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-334, April.
    3. Holger Graf, 2013. "Inventor Networks in Emerging Key Technologies: Information Technology vs. Semiconductors," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Guido Buenstorf & Uwe Cantner & Horst Hanusch & Michael Hutter & Hans-Walter Lorenz & Fritz Rahmeyer (ed.), The Two Sides of Innovation, edition 127, pages 55-76, Springer.
    4. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Chen, Min-Nan, 2016. "Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1845-1857.
    5. Consoli, Davide & Rentocchini, Francesco, 2015. "A taxonomy of multi-industry labour force skills," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1116-1132.
    6. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    7. Martin Srholec & Bart Verspagen, 2008. "The Voyage of the Beagle in Innovation Systems Land. Explorations on Sectors, Innovation, Heterogeneity and Selection," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20080220, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    8. Michel Dumont, 2015. "Working Paper 05-15 - Evaluation of federal tax incentives for private R&D in Belgium: An update," Working Papers 1505, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    9. Weidner, Nadia & Som, Oliver & Horvat, Djerdj, 2023. "An integrated conceptual framework for analysing heterogeneous configurations of absorptive capacity in manufacturing firms with the DUI innovation mode," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Trigo, Alexandre & Vence, Xavier, 2012. "Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 602-613.
    11. Alp Eren Yurtseven & Mehmet Teoman Pamukçu, 2022. "Innovation patterns in firms and intra-industry heterogeneity empirical evidence from Turkey," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 645-679, September.
    12. Marcel Ausloos & Francesca Bartolacci & Nicola G. Castellano & Roy Cerqueti, 2018. "Exploring how innovation strategies at time of crisis influence performance: a cluster analysis perspective," Papers 1808.05893, arXiv.org.
    13. Anna Wziątek-Kubiak & Marek Pęczkowski, 2021. "Strengthening the Innovation Resilience of Polish Manufacturing Firms in Unstable Environments," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 716-739, June.
    14. Marcel Ausloos & Francesca Bartolacci & Nicola G. Castellano & Roy Cerqueti, 2020. "Simple approaches on how to discover promising strategies for efficient enterprise performance, at time of crisis in the case of SMEs : Voronoi clustering and outlier effects perspective," Papers 2012.14297, arXiv.org.
    15. Hannu Littunen & Timo Tohmo & Esa Storhammar, 2021. "Innovation among SMEs in Finland: The impact of stakeholder engagement and firm-level characteristics," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(4), pages 157-196.
    16. Marco Capasso & Marina Rybalka, 2022. "Innovation Pattern Heterogeneity: Data-Driven Retrieval of Firms’ Approaches to Innovation," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Alessandro Arrighetti & Fabio Landini & Andrea Lasagni, 2021. "Swimming upstream throughout the turmoil: Evidence on firm growth during the great recession," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 68(3), pages 322-344, July.
    18. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    19. Andrés Barge-Gil & Alberto López, 2015. "R versus D: estimating the differentiated effect of research and development on innovation results," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(1), pages 93-129.
    20. Martijn J. Smit & Maria A. Abreu & Henri L.F. Groot, 2015. "Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 249-272, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovations; innovation activity; manufacturing firms; Poland; aggregation bias;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2021:i:2:p:39-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomasz Kwarcinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pteeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.