IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v6y2019i2p88-95id859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of 10th Chemistry Curriculum According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Author

Listed:
  • Seraceddin Levent Zorluoğlu
  • Aydın Kızılaslan

Abstract

In this study, evaluative case study was used to determine the realization level of the outcomes in the 10th chemistry curriculum. The 23 outcomes in the 10th grade chemistry curriculum were analyzed by two researchers. In order to determine the realization of the achievements based on practice, a chemistry teacher who attended the 10th grade chemistry course was observed. During the observations, notes were kept about the teaching, activity and evaluation dimensions of the application in order to make valid analyzes and shared with the other researcher to determine the size of the application according to RBT. In order to ensure the reliability of the observations, the analyzes were checked by an expert in RBT and the reliability coefficient was calculated (.79). When the realization status of the 10th grade chemistry curriculum is evaluated, it is understood that it meets 48% in teaching dimension, 57% in activity dimension and 83% in evaluation dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Seraceddin Levent Zorluoğlu & Aydın Kızılaslan, 2019. "Analysis of 10th Chemistry Curriculum According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 6(2), pages 88-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:6:y:2019:i:2:p:88-95:id:859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/859/1113
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:6:y:2019:i:2:p:88-95:id:859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.