IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/jeelre/v12y2025i1p64-81id6446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research engagement and its predictors among university academics: A comparison of two Arabian Gulf countries

Author

Listed:
  • Khulod Aljehani
  • Laila Mohebi

Abstract

Challenges remain in achieving world-class standards in teaching and research while higher education has recently developed rapidly in Arabian Gulf countries. This mixed-methods study compared research engagement among academics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) about demographics, institutional support, and collaborative practices. Data were collected through an online survey sent to 44 university academics. The quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed statistically and thematically. KSA universities had a balanced gender distribution while the UAE’s had a slight male majority. UAE academics reported being more motivated to conduct research than those in KSA. Regression analysis showed that forms of institutional support significantly predict research engagement in KSA but not in the UAE. Paired-sample t-tests revealed significant differences in research motivation and co-authorship with UAE academics collaborating more frequently. However, these countries had no significant differences in research engagement or institutional support. Thematic analysis indicated KSA academics were motivated more by extrinsic than intrinsic motivators. These findings suggest KSA universities need tailored policies to improve support mechanisms while UAE universities should sustain collaborative initiatives. Future research should use larger samples and longitudinal designs to explore more factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Khulod Aljehani & Laila Mohebi, 2025. "Research engagement and its predictors among university academics: A comparison of two Arabian Gulf countries," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 12(1), pages 64-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:64-81:id:6446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/article/view/6446/2940
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:64-81:id:6446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/JEELR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.