IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/asjoet/v5y2019i2p349-362id872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Country is More Effective in Science Teaching? Evidence from PISA 2015 as a Secondary School Assessment Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Gökhan Ilgaz
  • Menekşe Eskici
  • Levent Vural

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine how effectively different countries use educational inputs in the process of science education. The study is in the descriptive model and the data is derived from the PISA 2015 data set, which provides information to countries on secondary education programs. Data from 70 countries, including Turkey, were used in the study. The effectiveness of Turkey in the process of science teaching in secondary education has been compared with other countries and suggestions have been made to increase the effectiveness of secondary education science teaching. The data for this study are grouped into training inputs and training outputs. “Student behaviour hindering learning”, “teacher behaviour hindering learning”, “shortage of educational material”, “shortage of educational staff”, “professional development”, “teachers participation”, “curricular development”, “total number of science teachers at school”, “index science-specific resources (sum)” were defined as the educational inputs. The science achievements of students have been taken into account in determining which countries have more effective management of educational inputs accepted in this study. Secondary scholl level education inputs while nearby countries respectively to use effectively Slovakia (97.30%), Slovenia (91.16%), Brazil (90.50%), Turkey (89.75%), Finland (84.65%), Greece (83.31%), Denmark ( 83.25%), and Czech Republic (80.61%). education outcomes in Turkey is ranked as 20th in science teaching secrets to use it effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Gökhan Ilgaz & Menekşe Eskici & Levent Vural, 2019. "Which Country is More Effective in Science Teaching? Evidence from PISA 2015 as a Secondary School Assessment Tool," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 349-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:349-362:id:872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/article/view/872/1118
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:asjoet:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:349-362:id:872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/EDU/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.