IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoj/agafsr/v10y2023i2p28-31id5209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory demonstration and evaluation of improved onion variety in East Shewa zone of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Fistum Miruts
  • Belay Roba
  • Derara Sori

Abstract

The study was carried out in selected districts of East Shewa zone Oromia regional state to compare the performance of a recently released onion variety (Nafis) with their recommended agronomic recommendations to a control (Bombay red) through an on-farm demonstration. The demonstration was implemented on 9.3 hectares of 37 farmers’ farmland. The Nafis variety outperformed the control, with a mean yield of 293.2 qt/ha. The mean technology gap was 106.8 qt/ha and the technology index recorded was observed to be 26.7%. Farmers' preferences were used to evaluate onion varieties with criteria of yield, disease, bulb size, bulb color (deep red preferred), pungency, storability, and market preference. Nafis variety is preferred over the Bombay red variety. In addition, lack of improved seeds, high chemical costs, and insect and disease infestations are among the major constraints limiting onion production and productivity in the study area. Trips and fungi (Purple Bloch) have also been identified by farmers as a major disease affecting onion production in the districts. In general, the demonstrated variety (Nafis) was found to be feasible and preferred by the farmers to cultivate in the East Shewa zone as compared to the check (Bombay red). Therefore, onion yield in farmers' fields can be improved largely by cultivating the Nafis variety in the study area and similar environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Fistum Miruts & Belay Roba & Derara Sori, 2023. "Participatory demonstration and evaluation of improved onion variety in East Shewa zone of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia," Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 10(2), pages 28-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:aoj:agafsr:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:28-31:id:5209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AESR/article/view/5209/2703
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoj:agafsr:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:28-31:id:5209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://asianonlinejournals.com/index.php/AESR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.