IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aob/journl/y2010i1p2-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KMOD: Структурная макроэкономическая модель экономики Казахстана // KMOD: Structural Macroeconomic Model of the Economy of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Агамбаева С.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Альгожина А.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Хакимжанов С.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Конурбаева Б.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Кучеренко Е.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Талханбаева И.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Туреханова Н.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Тутушкин В.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Шагиахметова Р.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Шаих Ш.

    (National Bank of Kazakhstan)

  • Кемме Д.

    (Consultant, project with the Asian Development Bank)

Abstract

В рамках предоставления технической помощи со стороны Азиатского Банка Развития сотрудники Департамента исследований и статистики, Департамента платежного баланса и валютного регулирования и Управления финансовой стабильности разработали макроэконометрическую модель экономики Республики Казахстан. В качестве трех основных целей построения данной модели можно выделить следующие. Во-первых, модель была построена с целью раскрытия структуры экономики, лучшего понимания исторических и современных взаимосвязей между важными макроэкономическими показателями. Во-вторых, многие из оцененных уравнений представлены в виде «моделей корректировки равновесий» с целью получения среднесрочных прогнозов для критических показателей, в частности, для инфляции. В-третьих, симуляция сценариев может быть проведена как в рамках всей модели, так и в рамках каждого отдельного модуля. // As part of the provision of technical assistance from the Asian Bank Development the staff of the Research and Statistics Department, the Balance of Payments Department and the Financial Stability Department developed a macroeconometric model of the economy of Kazakhstan. Three main goals of building this model are the following. First, the model was built with the aim of revealing the structure of the economy, better understanding historical and contemporary relationships between important macroeconomic indicators. Second, many of the evaluated equations are presented in the form of "models adjusting equilibrium" in order to obtain medium-term forecasts for critical indicators, in particular for inflation. Third, the simulation of scenarios can be carried out both within the framework of the entire model and within the framework of each individual module.

Suggested Citation

  • Агамбаева С. & Альгожина А. & Хакимжанов С. & Конурбаева Б. & Кучеренко Е. & Талханбаева И. & Туреханова Н. & Тутушкин В. & Шагиахметова Р. & Шаих Ш. & Кемме Д., 2010. "KMOD: Структурная макроэкономическая модель экономики Казахстана // KMOD: Structural Macroeconomic Model of the Economy of Kazakhstan," Economic Review(National Bank of Kazakhstan), National Bank of Kazakhstan, issue 1, pages 2-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:aob:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:2-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/13174
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurence Ball & N. Gregory Mankiw, 2002. "The NAIRU in Theory and Practice," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 115-136, Fall.
    2. Taylor, John B., 1993. "Discretion versus policy rules in practice," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 195-214, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tibor Hledik & Karel Musil & Jakub Rysanek & Jaromir Tonner, 2018. "A Macroeconomic Forecasting Model of the Fixed Exchange Rate Regime for the Oil-Rich Kazakh Economy," Working Papers 2018/11, Czech National Bank.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athanasios Orphanides & John C. Williams, 2002. "Robust Monetary Policy Rules with Unknown Natural Rates," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 33(2), pages 63-146.
    2. Michael T. Kiley, 2003. "Why Is Inflation Low When Productivity Growth Is High?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(3), pages 392-406, July.
    3. Ellen E. Meade & Daniel L. Thornton, 2012. "The Phillips curve and US monetary policy: what the FOMC transcripts tell us," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 197-216, April.
    4. Gilbert Cette & Christian Pfister, 2004. "Challenges of the “New Economy” for Monetary Policy," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 8, pages 27-36, Spring.
    5. Daniel Kienzler & Kai D. Schmid, 2014. "Hysteresis in Potential Output and Monetary Policy," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(4), pages 371-396, September.
    6. John C. Williams, 2006. "Robust estimation and monetary policy with unobserved structural change," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 1-16.
    7. Murakami, Hiroki & Asada, Toichiro, 2018. "Inflation-deflation expectations and economic stability in a Kaleckian system," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 183-201.
    8. Peter N. Ireland, 2004. "Technology Shocks in the New Keynesian Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(4), pages 923-936, November.
    9. Kienzler, Daniel & Schmid, Kai Daniel, 2013. "Monetary policy and hysteresis in potential output," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 55, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
    10. Bozani, Vasiliki & Drydakis, Nick, 2011. "Studying the NAIRU and its Implications," IZA Discussion Papers 6079, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Zhu, Yanli & Chen, Haiqiang, 2017. "The asymmetry of U.S. monetary policy: Evidence from a threshold Taylor rule with time-varying threshold values," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 522-535.
    12. Herwartz, Helmut & Reimers, Hans-Eggert, 2006. "Modelling the Fisher hypothesis: World wide evidence," Economics Working Papers 2006-04, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    13. Teona Shugliashvili, 2023. "The words have power: the impact of news on exchange rates," FFA Working Papers 5.006, Prague University of Economics and Business, revised 31 Jul 2023.
    14. Kui-Wai Li, 2013. "The US monetary performance prior to the 2008 crisis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(24), pages 3450-3461, August.
    15. Patricks Ogiji & Tersoo Shimonkabir Shitile & Nuruddeen Usman, 2022. "Estimating asymmetries in monetary policy reaction function: an oil price augmented Taylor type rule for Nigeria under unconventional regime," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1655-1672, August.
    16. Guido Ascari & Tiziano Ropele, 2009. "Trend Inflation, Taylor Principle, and Indeterminacy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(8), pages 1557-1584, December.
    17. Adnan Haider Bukhari & Safdar Ullah Khan, 2008. "A Small Open Economy DSGE Model for Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 963-1008.
    18. Michal Brzoza-Brzezina, 2004. "The Information Content of the Natural Rate of Interest: The Case of Poland," Macroeconomics 0402007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Neuenkirch, Matthias & Siklos, Pierre L., 2013. "What's in a second opinion? Shadowing the ECB and the Bank of England," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 135-148.
    20. Jan Marc Berk & Jan Willem van den End, 2022. "Excess Liquidity and the Usefulness of the Money Multiplier," Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 55(4), pages 457-488.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies
    • E17 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aob:journl:y:2010:i:1:p:2-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Saida Agambayeva (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nbkgvkz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.