IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/anp/econom/v15y20142189_205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mr. Keynes and the neo-Schumpeterians: Contributions to the analysis of the determinants of innovation from a post-Keynesian perspective

Author

Listed:
  • João P. Romero

    (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, UK)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the importance of knowledge, both tacit and codified, in the formation of the state of long-term expectations that drive firms’ decisions to search for innovation and to investment in R&D. The paper takes the post-Keynesian theory as reference, associating it with the neo-Schumpeterian analysis of innovation dynamics. First, it is argued that knowledge plays a crucial role in building agents’ confidence, emphasizing that radical innovations are more dependent on the accumulation of codified knowledge, given the higher degree of uncertainty associated with this type of innovation, while incremental innovations are more dependent on tacit knowledge about the current market conditions and technological trajectory. Second, it is argued that the accumulation of knowledge and the constant introduction of innovations foster the creation of a convention to innovate, which facilitates the decision to pursue innovations by influencing long-term expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • João P. Romero, 2014. "Mr. Keynes and the neo-Schumpeterians: Contributions to the analysis of the determinants of innovation from a post-Keynesian perspective," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 15(2), pages 189-205.
    • Handle: RePEc:anp:econom:v:15:y:2014:2:189_205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758014000149#
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1517758014000149/1-s2.0-S1517758014000149-main.pdf?_tid=a0231392-3e7c-11e4-bab5-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1410966751_c3327f16a5c68e2481a337fdad41848d
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paredes-Frigolett, Harold & Pyka, Andreas & Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua, 2021. "On the performance and strategy of innovation systems: A multicriteria group decision analysis approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    3. Riccardo Pariboni & Pasquale Tridico, 2020. "Structural change, institutions and the dynamics of labor productivity in Europe," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1275-1300, November.
    4. Nestor Duch-Brown & Andrea de Panizza & Ibrahim Kholilul Rohman, 2016. "Innovation and productivity in a S&T intensive sector: the case of Information industries in Spain," JRC Research Reports JRC101847, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; Post-Keynesian theory; Neo-Schumpeterian theory; Technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • E12 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Keynes; Keynesian; Post-Keynesian; Modern Monetary Theory
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anp:econom:v:15:y:2014:2:189_205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rodrigo Zadra Armond (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/anpecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.