IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ann/inecon/y2014i8p209-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of European Union Preferential Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Nacewska-Twardowska

    (University of Lodz)

Abstract

Changes which have taken place in recent years in the foreign trade policy of the European Union are quite important and in particular include its attitude towards preferential trade agreements (PTAs). Although the EU’s trade policy history shows that PTAs have been used in the past, only in recent years has their importance increased. The Union is now linked to about 50 different trade liberalizing agreements. With the change of motives for undertaking bilateral negotiations, the spatial extent has also changed. Preferential trade agreements have become one of the primary means of creating the modern foreign trade policy of the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Nacewska-Twardowska, 2014. "The evolution of European Union Preferential Trade Agreements," International Economics, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, issue 8, pages 209-220, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ann:inecon:y:2014:i:8:p:209-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repozytorium.uni.lodz.pl:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11089/6389/Nacewska-Twardowska%202014.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Norman & Kirkpatrick, Colin, 2004. "A Pilot Study of the Quality of European Commission Extended Impact Assessment," Impact Assessment Research Centre (IARC) Working Papers 30580, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristian PÄ‚UN, 2016. "Economic Consequences of BREXIT after the British Referendum," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(2), pages 307-316, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Norman, 2004. "Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Integrated Assessment," Impact Assessment Research Centre (IARC) Working Papers 30575, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1065-1081 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Julia Hertin & John Turnpenny & Andrew Jordan & Mans Nilsson & Duncan Russel & Björn Nykvist, 2009. "Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1185-1200, May.
    4. Caroline Cecot & Robert Hahn & Andrea Renda & Lorna Schrefler, 2008. "An evaluation of the quality of impact assessment in the European Union with lessons for the US and the EU," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 405-424, December.
    5. Wouter De Ridder & John Turnpenny & Måns Nilsson & Anneke Von Raggamby, 2007. "A Framework For Tool Selection And Use In Integrated Assessment For Sustainable Development," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 423-441.
    6. Jacopo Torriti, 2007. "Impact Assessment in the EU: A Tool for Better Regulation, Less Regulation or Less Bad Regulation?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 239-276, March.
    7. Ragnar E. Lofstedt, 2007. "The 'Plateau-ing' of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An Analysis of Activities Carried out by the Barroso Commission1," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 423-447, June.
    8. Jacopo Torriti & Ragnar Löfstedt, 2012. "The first five years of the EU Impact Assessment system: a risk economics perspective on gaps between rationale and practice," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 169-186, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    international trade; trade policy of the European Union; trade agreements;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ann:inecon:y:2014:i:8:p:209-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: International Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/welodpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.