IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v23y2024i4p740-792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State of The Dotcom-Era Accounting Information Systems (AIS) Faculty and Implications for The Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Era

Author

Listed:
  • Akhilesh Chandra

    (Knowledge Consultant & University of Akron, USA)

  • Charles F. Malone

    (North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA)

Abstract

Research Questions- What was the state of accounting information systems (AIS) faculty in accounting programs of US universities and colleges (hereafter, institutions) at the peak of Dotcom? What can the artificial intelligence (AI)-era accounting education learn from its Dotcom experience? Motivation- Accounting education environment during the Dotcom-led innovations and the current AI- and Generative AI (GenAI)-led innovations bears similarities in many respects. While AIS faculty teach AIS courses where students learn information systems (IS) concepts including technology, processes and internal controls in greater detail and depth relative to other accounting courses, our literature review suggests a paucity of research on AIS faculty, especially during the Dotcom-era. AIS faculty is an appropriate proxy for the IS and information technology (IT) skills of accounting graduates’ market-ready quality. Therefore, we examine AIS faculty’s institutional characteristics during the Dotcom-era and consider implications for the AI-era accounting education to minimize capacity gaps, technology gaps, and resource gaps. Idea- We analyze US accounting programs for AIS faculty’s (i) individual features and (ii) association with institutional features. Data- We hand-collect data, from 1998-1999 Hasselback Accounting Faculty Directory (HAFD), which is just before the Dotcom’s bust and reflects the culmination of a series of actions taken by accounting programs and accounting education during the Dotcom-era. HAFD, our primary data source, provides faculty and program information in sufficient detail and granularity. Tools- We use count data econometric models corresponding to Poisson and Negative Binomial (NEGBIN) processes, since our response variable (i.e., AIS faculty) and its proxies suggest that they approximate a Poisson probability distribution. Findings- We find that doctoral programs supplying AIS faculty are public institutions and mostly in the southern states. AIS faculty are (i) less in private institutions; (ii) less in professor ranks; (iii) proportionately more with a PhD and certified public accountant (CPA) credentials; and (iv) similar in gender split, vis-à -vis all accounting faculty. AIS faculty associate positively with total accounting faculty size, accreditation and public institutions, and negatively with the presence of a doctoral program in the department. Contribution- We contribute to the existing research stream that examines accounting program quality and faculty background which proxy graduate’s market-readiness. At the theoretical and usefulness level, we contribute by using accounting education’s Dotcom experience to identify specific implications for the AI-era. At the methodological level, we theorize the count-data econometric features of AIS faculty and consider its five proxies, each with a different theoretical significance to associate with its factors. Significance- We discuss significance of our results by posing questions to stir debate, dialogue and discussion for devising action-based strategies that are sustainable, inclusive and equitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhilesh Chandra & Charles F. Malone, 2024. "State of The Dotcom-Era Accounting Information Systems (AIS) Faculty and Implications for The Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Era," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 740-792, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:740-792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/23_4_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph S. Valacich & Mark A. Fuller & Christoph Schneider & Alan R. Dennis, 2006. "Issues and Opinions---Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 107-125, June.
    2. Gordon, Teresa & Fischer, Mary & Malone, David & Tower, Greg, 2002. "A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the United States," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 235-275.
    3. Rock, Steve & Sedo, Stanley & Willenborg, Michael, 2000. "Analyst following and count-data econometrics," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 351-373, December.
    4. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Palmié, Maximilian & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 574-587.
    5. Nagle, Brian M. & Menk, K. Bryan & Rau, Stephen E., 2018. "Which accounting program characteristics contribute to CPA exam success? A study of institutional factors and graduate education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 20-31.
    6. Robert Dobre & Daniel Bulin & Maria-Cristina Iorgulescu & Iulia Monica Oehler-Sincai & Olimpia State, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Sector: The Next Technology Bubble? A Comparative Analysis with Dotcom Based on Stock Market Data," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(76), pages 24-37, June.
    7. Lawrence D. Brown & Ronald J. Huefner, 1994. "The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 223-250, June.
    8. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Zimmerman, Aleksandra B. & Richardson, Vernon J., 2016. "What do we mean by accounting program quality? A decomposition of accounting faculty opinions," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 16-42.
    9. Ballantine, Joan & Boyce, Gordon & Stoner, Greg, 2024. "A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Beverley Jackling & Paul De Lange, 2009. "Do Accounting Graduates' Skills Meet The Expectations of Employers? A Matter of Convergence or Divergence," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 369-385.
    11. Vicky Arnold & Steve G. Sutton, 2007. "The Impact of Enterprise Systems on Business and Audit Practice and the Implications for University Accounting education," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cordis, Adriana S. & Muzatko, Steven, 2021. "Higher education spending and CPA exam performance," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Fogarty, Timothy J. & Reinstein, Alan & Sasmaz, Mary B., 2021. "Is academic performance a zero-sum game? Exploring the nexus between research and education outcomes of U.S. accounting programs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Khaldoon Al-Htaybat & Larissa von Alberti-Alhtaybat & Zaidoon Alhatabat, 2018. "Educating digital natives for the future: accounting educators’ evaluation of the accounting curriculum," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 333-357, July.
    4. Athanasios MANDILAS & Dimitrios KOURTIDIS & Giannoula FLOROU & Stavros VALSAMIDIS, 2016. "Accounting Education And Research In Relation To Business Needs," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 15(3), pages 3-12.
    5. Wakefield, Robin, 2008. "Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 228-244.
    6. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Fecher, Benedikt & Harhoff, Dietmar & Wagner, Gert G., 2019. "Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 62-83.
    7. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    8. Allaudeen Hameed & Randall Morck & Jianfeng Shen & Bernard Yeung, 2015. "Information, Analysts, and Stock Return Comovement," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(11), pages 3153-3187.
    9. Hongyu Zhang & Asadullah Khaskheli & Syed Ali Raza & Amna Masood, 2024. "Linkage between Students’ Skills and Employability: Moderating Influence of University Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 229-248, November.
    10. Olavarrieta, Sergio, 2016. "Utilizando avaliações de especialistas para classificar 45 publicações latinoamericanas de negócios," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 56(3), May.
    11. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2023. "Artificial intelligence enabling circular business model innovation in digital servitization: Conceptualizing dynamic capabilities, AI capacities, business models and effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Susan O'Shea, 2017. "Characteristics and Skills Necessary in Accountancy," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Jones, M. J. & Brinn, T. & Pendlebury, M., 1996. "Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 597-602, October.
    14. Bernadette Smith & William Maguire & Helen Haijuan Han, 2018. "Generic skills in accounting: perspectives of Chinese postgraduate students," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 535-559, June.
    15. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2023. "Artificial intelligence-driven scalability and its impact on the sustainability and valuation of traditional firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Thomas Lange, 2006. "The Imprecise Science of Evaluating Scholarly Performance," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 505-532, August.
    17. Laudien, Sven M. & Manuel Guaita Martínez, José & María Martín Martín, José, 2023. "Business models based on sharing fashion and accessories: Qualitative-empirical insights into a new type of sharing economy business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Raquel Garde Sánchez & Jesús Mauricio Flórez-Parra & María Victoria López-Pérez & Antonio Manuel López-Hernández, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Information on Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis of the Top 200 Universities in the Shanghai Ranking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Carmona, Salvador, 1998. "Vogues in management accounting research," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 6545, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    20. Benaroch, Michel & Chernobai, Anna & Goldstein, James, 2012. "An internal control perspective on the market value consequences of IT operational risk events," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 357-381.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting Information Systems (AIS) faculty; Artificial Intelligence (AI); Dotcom; Accounting education; Poisson; Negative Binomial (NEGBIN); Hasselback accounting faculty directory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:740-792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.