IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v18y2019i4p559-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining Factors of the Quality of Joint Audit: Tunisian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Lassaad Abdelmoula
  • Habib Affes

    (Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, Tunisia)

Abstract

Research question: Identify the significant determinants of the quality of joint audit in the context of Tunisian companies. Motivation: Few studies have been conducted on the determinants of the quality of the joint audit in the Tunisian context. Thus, our study aimed to fill this gap. Idea: Our study aimed to fill this gap by studying Determining factors of joint auditors’ job quality in the Tunisian context. Data: Our methodology was applied to 222 Tunisian companies, 108 of which belong to the banking sector, 67 to the insurance sector, 28 whose commitment exceeds 25 billion dinars and 19 company having a consolidated balance sheet total of over 100 billion dinars. Tools: A "factorial analysis" was carried out followed by an "internal coherence" test. Then, a logistic regression, which enabled us to test the impact of each determining factor on the quality of the joint audit, was carried out. Findings: This study emphasizes the participation of several factors that enhance the quality of the joint audit. According to the predictive results of our model, it seems that the quality of the joint audit contributes to the prediction of three factors, namely competence, independence and reputation. Contribution: Our findings contribute through a better understanding of the determinants of the joint audit in a Tunisian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Lassaad Abdelmoula & Habib Affes, 2019. "Determining Factors of the Quality of Joint Audit: Tunisian Context," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 559-587, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:559-587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/18_4_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mishari M. Alfraih, 2016. "Corporate governance mechanisms and audit delay in a joint audit regulation," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(3), pages 292-316, July.
    2. Riadh Manita & Najoua Elommal, 2010. "The Quality of Audit Process: An Empirical Study with Audit Committees," Post-Print hal-00565534, HAL.
    3. Paul André & GéRaldine Broye & Christopher Pong & Alain Schatt, 2016. "Are Joint Audits Associated with Higher Audit Fees?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 245-274, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayad Ahmed Mohammed Al-Qublani & Hasnah Kamardin & Rohami Shafie, 2020. "Audit Committee Chair Attributes and Audit Report Lag in an Emerging Market," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 475-492, July.
    2. Qiang Guo & Christopher Koch & Aiyong Zhu, 2017. "Joint audit, audit market structure, and consumer surplus," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1595-1627, December.
    3. Sierra-García, Laura & Gambetta, Nicolás & García-Benau, María A. & Orta-Pérez, Manuel, 2019. "Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters: The case of the United Kingdom," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 227-240.
    4. Ratna Juwita & Sutrisno T & Bambang Hariadi, 2020. "Influence of audit committeeandinternal audit on audit report lag: Size of public accounting firm as a moderating variable," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(1), pages 137-142, January.
    5. Lasse Niemi & W. Robert Knechel & Hannu Ojala & Jill Collis, 2018. "Responsiveness of Auditors to the Audit Risk Standards: Unique Evidence from Big 4 Audit Firms," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 33-54, January.
    6. A.J. Omoolorun & T.O. Abilogun, 2017. "Fraud Free Financial Report: A Conceptual Review," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 83-94, October.
    7. Murad Harasheh & Roberta Provasi, 2023. "A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 384-401, January.
    8. Bhambhwani, Siddharth M. & Huang, Allen H., 2024. "Auditing decentralized finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    9. Florian Hoos & Jorien Louise Pruijssers & Michel W. Lander, 2019. "Who’s Watching? Accountability in Different Audit Regimes and the Effects on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 563-575, May.
    10. Gérald Lobo & Luc Paugam & Lana Zhang & Jean-François Casta, 2013. "Effect Of Joint Auditor Pair On Conserv A Tism: Evidence From Impairment Tests," Post-Print hal-00993007, HAL.
    11. Imen Fakhfakh Sakka & Anis Jarboui, 2016. "Audit reports timeliness: Empirical evidence from Tunisia," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1195680-119, December.
    12. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    13. Claus Holm & Frank Thinggaard, 2018. "From joint to single audits – audit quality differences and auditor pairings," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 321-344, April.
    14. Husaini, 2019. "The Substitution Role of Audit Committee Effectiveness and Audit Quality in Explaining Audit Report Lag," GATR Journals afr171, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    15. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:152-169 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Linus Axén & Torbjörn Tagesson & Denis Shcherbinin & Azra Custovic & Anna Ojdanic, 2019. "Does municipal ownership affect audit fees?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 693-713, September.
    17. Marcel Haak & Michelle Muraz & Roland Zieseniß, 2018. "Joint Audits: Does the Allocation of Audit Work Affect Audit Quality and Audit Fees?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 55-80, January.
    18. Nicole V. S. Ratzinger-Sakel & Sophie Audousset-Coulier & Jaana Kettunen & Cédric Lesage, 2013. "Joint Audit: Issues and Challenges for Researchers and Policy-Makers," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 175-199, November.
    19. Zhu, Jingqi & Spence, Crawford & Ezzamel, Mahmoud, 2021. "Thinking like the state: Doxa and symbolic power in the accounting field in China," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    joint audit; competence; respect of ethical rules and due diligence; independence; reputation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:559-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.