IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v15y2016i2p206-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR in Poland: Institutional Context, Legal Framework and Voluntary Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Dyczkowska

    (Wroclaw University of Economics, Poland)

  • Joanna Krasodomska

    (Cracow University of Economics, Poland)

  • Jan Michalak

    (Lodz University, Poland)

Abstract

The paper explores the level of CSR development in Poland and focuses on the roles of stakeholders actively involved in fostering the CSR concept in the country. The stakeholders include: (1) regulators (Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy, the Warsaw Stock Exchange and Polish Accounting Standards Committee); (2) NGOs (Responsible Business Forum and CSR Info); (3) media (Gazeta Prawna, Forbes, Manager magazine and Polityka journals); (4) business organizations (mainly subsidiaries of multinational companies and large enterprises partially state-owned) and (5) the Big 4 audit firms (Deloitte, KPMG, PwC). In order to delineate their efforts as regards promotion of CSR activities we use institutional-stakeholder approach. In the paper we characterize the social and political legacy of Poland – the country that has been changing its socioeconomic system for the last 25 years. We also scrutinize Polish accounting regulations and guidelines, which have built a legal framework for CSR disclosures. Our study also draws attention to the role of the Stock Exchange, the Ministry of Economy, and the Polish Agency of Entrepreneurship Development in promoting CSR-related actions. In order to explain media involvement we analyze the criteria of CSR rankings and awards and results of the companies. Finally, we outline the activities undertaken by NGOs in Poland and summarize research projects conducted by audit firms. The results of our study suggest that Polish business organizations still face many challenges in terms of CSR implementation. The main problems derive from misperception of CSR concept and unclear impacts of CSR adoption on business. A notable finding which emerged is that CSR evolution in Poland is in progress which calls for a need for further educational and promotional initiatives directed particularly at SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Dyczkowska & Joanna Krasodomska & Jan Michalak, 2016. "CSR in Poland: Institutional Context, Legal Framework and Voluntary Initiatives," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 206-254, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:206-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/15_2_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: An Introduction," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & René Schmidpeter & Matthias S. Fifka (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, edition 127, pages 1-14, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iwona Zdonek & Anna Mularczyk & Grzegorz Polok, 2021. "The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Future Managers—Comparative Research between Poland and Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Doś Anna, 2017. "The Effect of Foreign Equity Ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Poland," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 66-75, September.
    3. Justyna Dyduch & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Empirical Study of Polish Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Justyna Fijałkowska & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak & Przemysław Garsztka, 2018. "Corporate Social-Environmental Performance versus Financial Performance of Banks in Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2017. "CSR Disclosure in Polish-Listed Companies in the Light of Directive 2014/95/EU Requirements: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Anna Witek-Crabb, 2019. "CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esther Prieto-Jiménez & Luis López-Catalán & Blanca López-Catalán & Guillermo Domínguez-Fernández, 2021. "Sustainable Development Goals and Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Michael S. Aßländer & Tobias Gössling & Peter Seele, 2016. "Editorial: Business Ethics in a European Perspective: A Case for Unity in Diversity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 633-637, December.
    3. Monika Sipa & Malgorzata Smolarek & Tomasz Jalowiec & Piotr Masloch & Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciula & Grzegorz Masloch, 2021. "Diversity of Factors Determining Employee Satisfaction as an Area of CSR Activity in Companies of Different Scale," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 507-522.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSR; institutional context; legal framework; Poland; stakeholders;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:206-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.