IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v10y2011i2p106-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The illusion of comparable European IFRS financial statements. Beliefs of auditors, analysts and other users

Author

Listed:
  • Vicky COLE
  • Joel BRANSON
  • Diane BREESCH

    (Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

Reaching higher comparability was one of the main goals of the implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the European Union in 2005. However, national accounting traditions and cultural differences continue to cause differences in the application of IFRS (KPMG & von Keitz, 2006). European IFRS financial statements might therefore be less comparable than users of these statements possibly assume. This study contributes by determining to what extent auditors, analysts and other users of European IFRS financial statements believe that these statements are comparable and what they perceive to be the most important problem areas when it comes to comparability. Our survey of 426 individuals reveals that only 41% of the respondents believe that European IFRS financial statements are comparable. The more experienced respondents are, the less they believe in the comparability of these statements. Overall, 13 areas are perceived as problematic for the comparability of IFRS financial statements by at least half of the respondents. The three main issues that appear in most of these problem areas are interpretation differences, subjectivity and disclosure differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicky COLE & Joel BRANSON & Diane BREESCH, 2011. "The illusion of comparable European IFRS financial statements. Beliefs of auditors, analysts and other users," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 10(2), pages 106-134, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:10:y:2011:i:2:p:106-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/10_2_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Droj Laurentiu, 2012. "Financial Performance Analysis Based On The Financial Statements For The Companies Located In The Bihor - Hajdu Bihar Euroregion," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 464-470, December.
    2. Golubeva, Olga, 2020. "Maximising international returns: Impact of IFRS on foreign direct investments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    3. Łojek Paweł, 2020. "The relationship between profitability and financial liquidity among the importers of best-selling brands of new cars in poland," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 7(54), pages 127-142, January.
    4. MIRON Vasile Cristian Ioachim & BURJA Vasile & FOCSAN Eleonora Ionela, 2015. "Content Of Financial Statements And Their Informative Valences For Stakeholders," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 255-261, July.
    5. Ankur Tewari, 2018. "An Exploration of Experiences and Academic Challenges of African Female Student at University of Zululand, South Africa (UNIZULU)," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 8(3), pages 43-54.
    6. Philip Brown, 2011. "International Financial Reporting Standards: what are the benefits?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 269-285, August.
    7. Andreea Paula Dumitru, 2014. "Perceptions Of Professional Accountants On The Costs And Benefits Of Implementing Ias/Ifrs In Romania," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 2(2), pages 66-75, November.
    8. Sami El Omari & Mohamed Taieb Hamadi & Wafa Khlif, 2016. "La diversité des sources d'interprétation et d'application des normes comptables internationales ; un frein à la convergence de la pratique," Post-Print hal-01900554, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Comparability; European IFRS financial statements; survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:10:y:2011:i:2:p:106-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.