IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alq/rufejo/rfej_2020_03_23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal support of regional development: investment aspect

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Vladimirovna Grishina

    (Russian Foreign Trade Academy; Council for the Study of Productive Resources; Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia)

  • Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kotov

    (Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article describes a methodical approach to efficiency assessment of the federal tools for regional development support, which links the intensity of various supporting measures of the regions with the intensity of attracting extra-budgetary investments into their fixed capital (as the dependent variable). Based on empirical evidence of Russia from 2000 to present the article shows that regional development support tools have had a little impact on attracting private investment in most regions, becoming a significant factor in the revitalization of the investment processes only for some of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Vladimirovna Grishina & Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kotov, 2020. "Federal support of regional development: investment aspect," Russian Foreign Economic Journal, Russian Foreign Trade Academy Ministry of economic development of the Russian Federation, issue 3, pages 23-34, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:alq:rufejo:rfej_2020_03_23-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.vavt.ru/RePEc/alq/rufejo/rfej_2020_03_23-34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Gibbons & Max Nathan & Henry G. Overman, 2014. "Evaluating Spatial Policies," SERC Policy Papers 012, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Enrico Moretti, 2014. "Local Economic Development, Agglomeration Economies, and the Big Push: 100 Years of Evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(1), pages 275-331.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra Bernick & Richard Davies & Anna Valero, 2017. "Industry in Britain - an atlas," CEP Reports 34, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Junichi Yamasaki, 2017. "Railroads, Technology Adoption, and Modern Economic Development: Evidence from Japan," ISER Discussion Paper 1000, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    3. Brachert, Matthias & Dettmann, Eva & Titze, Mirko, 2019. "The regional effects of a place-based policy – Causal evidence from Germany," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato & Owen Zidar, 2016. "Who Benefits from State Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2582-2624, September.
    5. Elias Einiö & Henry G. Overman, 2016. "The (Displacement) Effects of Spatially Targeted Enterprise Initiatives: Evidence from UK LEGI," SERC Discussion Papers 0191, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Enflo, Kerstin & Molinder, Jakob & Karlsson, Tobias, 2019. "More Power to the People: Electricity Adoption, Technological Change and Social Conflict," CEPR Discussion Papers 13986, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Becker, Sascha O. & Heblich, Stephan & Sturm, Daniel M., 2021. "The impact of public employment: Evidence from Bonn," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Rodríguez-Pose,Andrés & Bartalucci,Federico & Nancy Lozano Gracia & Maria Davalos, 2024. "Overcoming Left-Behindedness : Moving beyond the Efficiency versus Equity Debate in Territorial Development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10734, The World Bank.
    9. Maximilian v. Ehrlich & Tobias Seidel, 2018. "The Persistent Effects of Place-Based Policy: Evidence from the West-German Zonenrandgebiet," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 344-374, November.
    10. Maniloff, Peter & Mastromonaco, Ralph, 2017. "The local employment impacts of fracking: A national study," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 62-85.
    11. Vadim Elenev & Luis E. Quintero & Alessandro Rebucci & Emilia Simeonova, 2021. "Direct and Spillover Effects from Staggered Adoption of Health Policies: Evidence from COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders," NBER Working Papers 29088, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Enghin Atalay & Ali Hortacsu & Mustafa Runyun & Chad Syverson & Mehmet Fatih Ulu, 2023. "Micro- and Macroeconomic Impacts of a Place-Based Industrial Policy," Working Papers 23-12, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    13. Marcel Henkel & Tobias Seidel & Jens Suedekum, 2021. "Fiscal Transfers in the Spatial Economy," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 433-468, November.
    14. Eliason, Paul & Lutz, Byron, 2018. "Can fiscal rules constrain the size of government? An analysis of the “crown jewel” of tax and expenditure limitations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 115-144.
    15. Bosker, Maarten & Park, Jane & Roberts, Mark, 2021. "Definition matters. Metropolitan areas and agglomeration economies in a large-developing country," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Cheng, An-Ting, 2024. "Evaluating spatial policies without indicators: A study on Taiwan as a developmental state in transition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Redding, Stephen & Miyauchi, Yuhei & Nakajima, Kentaro, 2021. "Consumption Access and Agglomeration: Evidence from Smartphone Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 15839, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Price Fishback, 2017. "How Successful Was the New Deal? The Microeconomic Impact of New Deal Spending and Lending Policies in the 1930s," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1435-1485, December.
    19. Shimeng Liu, 2015. "Spillovers from Universities: Evidence from the Land-Grant Program," Working Paper 9410, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    20. Monica Andini & Guido de Blasio, 2012. "Local Development that Money Can’t Buy: Italy’s Contratti di Programma," ERSA conference papers ersa12p464, European Regional Science Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alq:rufejo:rfej_2020_03_23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Katolik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vavtmru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.