IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alp/revaef/06-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminicidios en Perú. ¿Son algunos departamentos intrínsecamente más peligrosos para las mujeres?

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Mori Mojalott

Abstract

El feminicidio en Perú es un problema que afecta a cada uno de sus departamentos, a algunos en mayor medida. Departamentos como Madre de Dios y otros del sur del país (como Tacna, Arequipa, Ayacucho o Moquegua) poseen, sostenidamente, las tasas más elevadas de feminicidio durante los últimos años. Esta situación podría estar evidenciando condiciones favorables para los feminicidios en zonas geográficas especifica o ser parte de condiciones generales que propician mayores tasas de homicidios dolosos y, como consecuencia de este mayor nivel de violencia, mayores tasas de feminicidio. En ese contexto, empleando un modelo de datos de panel, para el periodo 2011-2018 y los 24 departamentos del país más la Provincia Constitucional del Callao, buscamos evidencia estadística para concluir si, luego de controlar la tasa de feminicidio agregado (la que incluye las tentativas de feminicidio) por la tasa de homicidios dolosos, efectos temporales y diversas variables utilizadas en la literatura (como iniciativas de gobierno, variables de progreso de género, variables asociadas al feminicida, variables macrosociales), persisten diferencias significativas en la tasa de feminicidio agregado entre departamentos. Encontramos que a un nivel de significancia de hasta el 10%, en la Provincia Constitucional del Callao y Tacna, Ica, Arequipa y Moquegua existirían efectos propios asociados al departamento que explicarían una mayor tasa de feminicidio agregado, por lo que la recomendación incide en direccionar correctamente las políticas públicas, mediante un tratamiento focalizado de este tipo de delitos en las referidas zonas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Mori Mojalott, 2021. "Feminicidios en Perú. ¿Son algunos departamentos intrínsecamente más peligrosos para las mujeres?," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 4(01), pages 19-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:alp:revaef:06-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://contabilidadyeconomiausmp.edu.pe/OJS2020/index.php/RAEF/article/view/29
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greg Kaplan & Benjamin Moll & Giovanni L. Violante, 2018. "Monetary Policy According to HANK," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(3), pages 697-743, March.
    2. Greg Kaplan & Giovanni L. Violante & Justin Weidner, 2014. "The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 45(1 (Spring), pages 77-153.
    3. Cornwell, Christopher & Trumbull, William N, 1994. "Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(2), pages 360-366, May.
    4. Greg Kaplan & Giovanni L. Violante & Justin Weidner, 2014. "The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 77-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Heathcote & Fabrizio Perri, 2018. "Wealth and Volatility," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(4), pages 2173-2213.
    2. Albonico, Alice & Tirelli, Patrizio, 2020. "Financial crises and sudden stops: Was the European monetary union crisis different?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 13-26.
    3. Giovanni L. Violante & Greg Kaplan, 2022. "The Marginal Propensity to Consume in Heterogeneous Agent Models," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 747-775, August.
    4. Anna Sokolova, 2023. "Marginal Propensity to Consume and Unemployment: a Meta-analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 813-846, December.
    5. Florin Bilbiie & Xavier Ragot, 2021. "Optimal Monetary Policy and Liquidity with Heterogeneous Households," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 41, pages 71-95, July.
    6. Adrien Auclert, 2019. "Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(6), pages 2333-2367, June.
    7. Gregor Boehl & Gavin Goy & Felix Strobel, 2024. "A Structural Investigation of Quantitative Easing," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(4), pages 1028-1044, July.
    8. Nemeczek, Fabian & Radermacher, Jan, 2022. "Personality-augmented MPC: Linking survey and transaction data to explain MPC heterogeneity by Big Five personality traits," SAFE Working Paper Series 348, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    9. Hohberger, Stefan & Priftis, Romanos & Vogel, Lukas, 2020. "The distributional effects of conventional monetary policy and quantitative easing: Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Atalay, Kadir & Edwards, Rebecca, 2022. "House prices, housing wealth and financial well-being," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Fergus Cumming & Paul Hubert, 2019. "The Role of Households' Borrowing Constraints in the Transmission of Monetary Policy This paper investigates how the transmission of monetary policy to the real economy depends on the distribution of ," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2019-20, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    12. Christopher D. Carroll & Edmund Crawley & Jiri Slacalek & Kiichi Tokuoka & Matthew N. White, 2020. "Sticky Expectations and Consumption Dynamics," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 40-76, July.
    13. Orlando Gomes, 2021. "Hand-to-mouth consumers, rule-of-thumb savers, and optimal control," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 16(2), pages 229-263, April.
    14. Fergus Cumming & Paul Hubert, 2019. "The role of households' borrowing constraints in the transmission of monetary policy," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03403257, HAL.
    15. Felipe Alves & Greg Kaplan & Benjamin Moll & Giovanni L. Violante, 2020. "A Further Look at the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks in HANK," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(S2), pages 521-559, December.
    16. Daniel Lewis & Davide Melcangi & Laura Pilossoph, 2019. "Latent Heterogeneity in the Marginal Propensity to Consume," 2019 Meeting Papers 519, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Adam Pigoń, 2022. "A Simple Model of Educated Hand-to-Mouth Consumers," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 20-43.
    18. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Joël Marbet & Galo Nuño & Omar Rachedi, 2023. "Inequality and the Zero Lower Bound," NBER Working Papers 31282, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Panagiotis Bouras & Joaquín Saldain & Xing Guo & Thomas Michael Pugh & Maria teNyenhuis, 2024. "Impacts of interest rate hikes on the consumption of households with a mortgage," Staff Analytical Notes 2024-14, Bank of Canada.
    20. Alisdair McKay & Ricardo Reis, 2021. "Optimal Automatic Stabilizers [Consumption versus Expenditure]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2375-2406.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alp:revaef:06-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Renzo Vidal C. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesmppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.