IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alg/jijdte/v1y2016i2p97-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Games Usage for Decision Support: Example of the Near Beer Game

Author

Listed:
  • Jovana Zoroja

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Matea Majdandzic

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Simulation games present valuable pedagogical tool in many different areas, e. g. education, finance, production, sales, supply chain, and employment process. The main reason for their usage is that theoretical knowledge is not enough to understand the business processes. Simulation games improve learnig, since they actively involve participants in virtual world and encourage them to apply theoretical knowledge and facilitate their understanding of business processes. Use of simulation games is increasing every year, especially in students’ and managers’ education, as they enable participants to acquire new skills and learn how to make decision through practice. Involvement in simulation games, enable participants to learn how to make decisions, how to improve their decisions through analysis and feedback at the end of the game, without any consequences. The goal of the paper is to describe simulation games and their role in decision making process. In this paper, we want to show how simulation games can support and improve decision making process at the example of The Near Beer Game.

Suggested Citation

  • Jovana Zoroja & Matea Majdandzic, 2016. "Simulation Games Usage for Decision Support: Example of the Near Beer Game," International Journal of Digital Technology and Economy, Algebra University College, vol. 1(2), pages 97-106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:alg:jijdte:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:97-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://algebra.hr/publications//ijdte/vol1_iss2/IJDTE_01_02_2016_P3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor Mayer & Martin de Jong, 2004. "Combining GDSS and Gaming for Decision Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 223-241, May.
    2. Tal Ben-Zvi & Thomas C. Carton, 2007. "From Rhetoric to Reality: Business Games as Educational Tools," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 10-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Feng & Jean-François Audy & Mikael Rönnqvist & Sophie D’Amours, 2020. "An Educational Game with Dragons’ Den Experiences for Supply Chain Management Training," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 13-29, September.
    2. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    3. Sophie D'Amours & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2013. "An Educational Game in Collaborative Logistics," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 102-113, January.
    4. Michael F. Gorman, 2012. "Analytics, Pedagogy and the Pass the Pigs Game," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 57-64, September.
    5. Ian D. Frommer & Robert W. Day, 2017. "Game—A Carbon Emissions Game," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 56-70, September.
    6. Yao Zhao & Arim Park & Olena Rudna & Ju Myung Song, 2023. "Game—FloraPark (the Flower Game): A Supply Chain Contract and Collaboration Simulation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 105-117, September.
    7. Inge Bleijenbergh & Hubert Korzilius & Piet Verschuren, 2011. "Methodological criteria for the internal validity and utility of practice oriented research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 145-156, January.
    8. Christopher P. Wright, 2015. "Game—The Zu Zitter Game: A Course-Long Tool for Teaching Operations Management," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 240-253, May.
    9. Ya-Cing Jhan & Pin Luarn & Hong-Wen Lin, 2022. "Individual Differences in Digital Game-Based Supply Chains Management Learning: Evidence from Higher Vocational Education in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Femke Bekius & Sebastiaan Meijer & Hugo Thomassen, 2022. "A Real Case Application of Game Theoretical Concepts in a Complex Decision-Making Process: Case Study ERTMS," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 153-185, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alg:jijdte:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:97-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Kopal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://algebra.university/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.