IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/alg/jijdte/v1y2016i2p75-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bridge Too Far: Abraham Maslow's Bridging the Is-Ought Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Borna Jalsenjak

    (Zagreb School of Economics and Management, Zagreb, Croatia; Faculty of Philosophy of the Society of Jesus, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Kristijan Krkac

    (Zagreb School of Economics and Management, Zagreb, Croatia; Faculty of Philosophy of the Society of Jesus, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

In this paper the authors argue for creation of management practices based on several facts about human beings. This is done by stating bridge propositions between what is found to be (facts), and what ought to be done (oughts). They attempt to justify that it is not too big of a gap. Contrarywise, not bridging it has serious consequences for any business enterprise. Concerning the Is-Ought Gap, Maslow implicitly claims something like "Don't Mind the Gap", because there is not one.

Suggested Citation

  • Borna Jalsenjak & Kristijan Krkac, 2016. "A Bridge Too Far: Abraham Maslow's Bridging the Is-Ought Gap," International Journal of Digital Technology and Economy, Algebra University College, vol. 1(2), pages 75-84, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:alg:jijdte:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:75-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://algebra.hr/publications//ijdte/vol1_iss2/IJDTE_01_02_2016_P1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard M. Ryan & Veronika Huta & Edward Deci, 2008. "Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 139-170, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Violeta Misheva, 2016. "What Determines Emotional Well-Being? The Role of Adverse Experiences: Evidence Using Twin Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1921-1937, October.
    3. Geurim Han & Junghwa Kim & Sun W. Park, 2018. "Extrinsic Value Orientation and Decreased Sustainability of Shared Resources: The Moderating Role of Situational Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Therese Kobbeltvedt & Katharina Wolff, 2009. "The Risk-as-feelings hypothesis in a Theory-of-planned-behaviour perspective," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(7), pages 567-586, December.
    5. Waratta Authayarat & Hiroyuki Umemuro, 2012. "Workplace Environment Characteristics as Antecedents of Affective Well-being in the Workplace," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(6), pages 307-324, December.
    6. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2013. "A Comparison of Western and Islamic Conceptions of Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1857-1874, December.
    7. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    8. Jen-Ho Chang & Chin-Lan Huang & Yi-Cheng Lin, 2015. "Mindfulness, Basic Psychological Needs Fulfillment, and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1149-1162, October.
    9. Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Opportunity And Preference Learning," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 275-295, July.
    10. Qin Yang & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Gabriele Giorgi & Dante Castillo Guajardo & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Special Issue “Rethinking the Subjective Wellbeing for a New Workplace Scenario”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-6, April.
    12. Kautonen, Teemu & Kibler, Ewald & Minniti, Maria, 2017. "Late-career entrepreneurship, income and quality of life," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 318-333.
    13. Taha-Yacine Naqach & Farid Chaouki, 2023. "Exploring the power of psychological empowerment in boosting workforce agility in SMEs [Exploration du potentiel de l'autonomisation psychologique pour stimuler l'agilité des employés dans les PME]," Post-Print hal-04273418, HAL.
    14. Bret Crane, 2022. "Eudaimonia in Crisis: How Ethical Purpose Finding Transforms Crisis," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 391-416, December.
    15. Brittney K. Anderson & John P. Meyer & Chelsea Vaters & Jose A. Espinoza, 2020. "Measuring Personal Growth and Development in Context: Evidence of Validity in Educational and Work Settings," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2141-2167, August.
    16. Alex C. Michalos & Kenneth C. Land, 2018. "Replies to Our Commentators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 1057-1078, February.
    17. Julia Aubouin-Bonnaventure & Evelyne Fouquereau & Hélène Coillot & Fadi-Joseph Lahiani & Séverine Chevalier, 2023. "A New Gain Spiral at Work: Relationships between Virtuous Organizational Practices, Psychological Capital, and Well-Being of Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Nikolova, Milena & Cnossen, Femke, 2020. "What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Mars, Lidón & Arroyo, Rosa & Ruiz, Tomás, 2022. "Mobility and wellbeing during the covid-19 lockdown. Evidence from Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 107-129.
    20. Alexandra Ganglmair-Wooliscroft & Ben Wooliscroft, 2019. "Well-Being and Everyday Ethical Consumption," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 141-163, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:alg:jijdte:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:75-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Kopal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://algebra.university/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.