IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/soceco/v28y2006i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting or Preventing Reforms?

Author

Listed:
  • Menno Fenger

    (Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherland)

Abstract

In the dominant perspective on trade unions, stronger trade unions are supposed to lead to higher wages and less extensive welfare reforms. This article focuses on the role of trade unions in the processes of welfare reform in Central and Eastern European countries in the last decade, and aims to assess the extent to which this role is comparable to that of trade unions in Western countries. The article analyses key characteristics of trade unions' roles and positions in Bulgaria, Croatia, Moldova, Romania, Poland and Slovenia. These characteristics are related to the social policy reforms and wage developments in these countries, in order to analyse if the dominant perspective holds true also for Central and Eastern European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Menno Fenger, 2006. "Promoting or Preventing Reforms?," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 28(1), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:28:y:2006:i:1:p:1-26
    Note: This article has benefited greatly from the author’s stay at the Center for European Studies (CES), Harvard University. The author wishes to thank everyone at CES for their hospitality and inspiration.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://akademiai.com/content/m814253408214207/fulltext.pdf
    Download Restriction: subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarína LukÃ¡Ä ová & Lucia KovÃ¡Ä ová & Martin Kahanec, 2022. "Industrial relations and unemployment benefit schemes in the Visegrad countries during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(2), pages 229-246, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:28:y:2006:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.