IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/creelt/v7y2025i1p54-62id5627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating GAI tools and scaffolding-based learning to enhance learning outcomes in English-medium programming courses

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Yu Chen

Abstract

This study explores the impact of integrating Generative AI (GAI) educational tools, such as Kahoot!, Slido, Notebook LM, and Visual Studio Code, with scaffolding-based learning in English-medium programming courses for first-year university students. The research aims to assess whether this hybrid teaching approach enhances students' learning outcomes, engagement, and learning continuity. A quasi-experimental design was employed, dividing participants into two groups: a control group utilizing traditional scaffolding methods and an experimental group integrating GAI tools alongside scaffolding techniques. Evaluation metrics included coursework performance, final project scores, student feedback surveys, and post-course learning continuation. The findings indicate that the experimental group outperformed the control group in programming achievements, exhibited higher satisfaction and engagement levels, and showed a greater propensity for continued learning. The key conclusion is that incorporating interactive digital tools and AI-assisted scaffolding mitigates learning barriers in English-taught programming courses, enhances student performance and confidence, and fosters long-term learning motivation. The study concludes with recommendations for future research, including expanding the sample size and analyzing long-term effects, while emphasizing the practical implications of this approach in bilingual education settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Yu Chen, 2025. "Integrating GAI tools and scaffolding-based learning to enhance learning outcomes in English-medium programming courses," Contemporary Research in Education and English Language Teaching, Learning Gate, vol. 7(1), pages 54-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:creelt:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:54-62:id:5627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0230/article/view/5627/2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:creelt:v:7:y:2025:i:1:p:54-62:id:5627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Laurence (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2641-0230/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.