IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajo/ijoest/v2y2019i2p100-108id111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping Strategies of Stress Adopted by Female Employees with Children in the University of Cape Coast: Implications for Management Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Regina Sally Maison
  • Grace Yeboah
  • Grace Aba Mensah
  • Mabel Anane

Abstract

The study investigated the coping strategies of stress adopted by female employees with children in the university of Cape Coast. A descriptive study was the designed employed in carrying out the study. Two hundred and four (204) respondents were sampled from 431 female employees with children to answer a set of questionnaires. The results revealed that demands from husbands and thinking of promotional issues were some of the stressors that confronted the respondents. The major effects of stress among the respondents were their inability to plan well and lack of concentration on household chores. The result showed that the most prevailing coping strategy adopted by the respondents was engaging in conversation with friends and family members as well as getting assistance from colleagues. It was concluded that female employees with children in the University of Cape Coast go through stress, which emanates from different sources. Some of the recommendations were that management of the University must educate their employees on and appropriate strategies to cope with their stress. That could be done by management through seminars conferences, workshops on coping strategies of stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Regina Sally Maison & Grace Yeboah & Grace Aba Mensah & Mabel Anane, 2019. "Coping Strategies of Stress Adopted by Female Employees with Children in the University of Cape Coast: Implications for Management Practices," International Journal of Educational Studies, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 100-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:2:y:2019:i:2:p:100-108:id:111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/111/69
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajo:ijoest:v:2:y:2019:i:2:p:100-108:id:111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academiainsight.com/index.php/ijes/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.