IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnljtr/v9y2023i1p110-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Iulia E. Labunets
  • Igor A. Mayburov

Abstract

The study focuses on the problem of rationality of economic entities, in particular the rationality of their tax and economic behavior in a given period. The data on enterprises in the Russian foreign sector are used to examine the relationship between the levels of rationality observed in their economic and tax behavior. The representative sample includes 1,206 micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises that specialize in logging, wood processing and wholesale timber trade and have forest lease agreements. The study covers the period from 2017 to 2021. Rationality of corporate behavior is understood as profit maximizing behavior or, in other words, as companies’ pursuit of maximum utility. Our theoretical review of the research on rationality in economic and tax behavior has led us to formulate the following assumptions. In economic behavior, rationality manifests itself primarily in companies’ efforts to improve the efficiency of resource use (labor, finance, and tangible assets). Rationality in tax behavior is associated with companies’ efforts to minimize their tax expenditures. Therefore, to assess the rationality of economic behavior, we used such indicators as labor productivity, return on own capital, return on borrowed capital, return on fixed assets, return on operating assets, business profitability, the stage of the lifecycle, and tax risk management. To assess rationality of tax behavior, we estimated the level of audit risk, that is, each company’s chances of being audited. Our study has confirmed the hypothesis that the rationality of tax and economic behavior has an inverse relationship. In other words, the more rational is the economic behavior of a firm, the less rational is its tax behavior. The strength of this relationship is impacted by three main factors: 1) the size of a business; 2) the level of opportunism; and 3) the type of activity. For the enterprises in the forestry sector covered by our analysis, we found that a change in the level of rationality of their tax behavior in 72.9% of cases leads to a change in the level of rationality of their economic behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulia E. Labunets & Igor A. Mayburov, 2023. "Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 9(1), pages 110-127.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:110-127
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://taxreform.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_15907/2023/Labunets_Mayburov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.1.132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norton, William I, Jr & Moore, William T, 2002. "Entrepreneurial Risk: Have We Been Asking the Wrong Question?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 281-287, June.
    2. Jia, Yingya & Tsui, Anne S. & Yu, Xiaoyu, 2021. "Beyond Bounded Rationality: CEO Reflective Capacity and Firm Sustainability Performance," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 777-814, October.
    3. George P. Huber, 1991. "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 88-115, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvie Héroux & Mélanie Roussy, 2020. "Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 449-479, June.
    2. Andrea Francesconi & Enrico Guarini, 2017. "Performance-based funding e sistemi di allocazione delle risorse ai dipartimenti: prime evidenze nelle universit? italiane," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 113-134.
    3. Pooja Kushwaha & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Integrating the Linkages between Learning Systems and Knowledge Process: An Exploration of Learning Outcomes," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(1), pages 11-23, January.
    4. Nicolai J. Foss, 1996. "Firms, Incomplete Contracts and Organizational Learning," DRUID Working Papers 96-2, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    5. Edna Isabel de la Garza Martinez & Zochitl Araiza Garza & Nidia Estela Hernández Castro & Izamar Guadalupe Amador Charles, 2016. "Relationship Between Levels Of Organization Learning,Relacion Entre Los Niveles De Aprendizaje Organizacional," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(3), pages 71-82.
    6. Schweizer, Lars & Patzelt, Holger, 2012. "Employee commitment in the post-acquisition integration process: The effect of integration speed and leadership," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 298-310.
    7. Bianco, Federica & Michelino, Francesca, 2010. "The role of content management systems in publishing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 117-124.
    8. Eelke Wiersma, 2007. "Conditions That Shape the Learning Curve: Factors That Increase the Ability and Opportunity to Learn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(12), pages 1903-1915, December.
    9. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    10. Nachiketa Tripathi & Sonia Nongmaithem, 2007. "Differences in Organizational Learning Processes: A Study of Two Organizations," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 32(3), pages 301-320, August.
    11. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    12. Park, Hyun-Soo & Auh, Seigyoung & Maher, Amro A. & Singhapakdi, Anusorn, 2012. "Marketing's accountability and internal legitimacy: Implications for firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1576-1582.
    13. Schilling, Melissa A. & Green, Elad, 2011. "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1321-1331.
    14. Di Guardo, Maria Chiara & Marrocu, Emanuela & Paci, Raffaele, 2016. "The effect of local corruption on ownership strategy in cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4225-4241.
    15. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    16. Daniela P. Blettner & Zi-Lin He & Songcui Hu & Richard A. Bettis, 2015. "Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 987-1005, July.
    17. Mohammadi, Ali & Broström, Anders & Franzoni, Chiara, 2015. "Work Force Composition and Innovation: How Diversity in Employees’ Ethnical and Disciplinary Backgrounds Facilitates Knowledge Re-combination," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 413, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    18. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    19. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management in the SME and its Relationship to Strategy, Family Orientation and Organization Learning," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-026-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b05 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Maria Darra, 2013. "Learning Styles as a Fundamental Improvement Factor of Learning Quality," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 117-140.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax behavior; economic behavior; rationality of behavior; economic entity; forestry sector; correlation; size of business; type of activity; opportunism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:110-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.