IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v22y2023i2p355-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Impact of Transparency and Affordability of Technological Connection on the Developer's Decision on New Construction in Russian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg O. Smirnov

Abstract

Technological connection of new construction facilities to public infrastructure is one of the key sources of financing for urban infrastructure. It is assumed that in order to attract developers, it is important for cities to have affordable and transparent procedures for technological connection. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the impact of the affordability and transparency of technological connection procedures on the developer's decision on new construction in Russian cities. The scientific hypothesis is that these characteristics should have an impact mainly on the cost indicators of building construction. As part of the study, 152 regulatory documents (decrees, orders, etc.) were analyzed for resource-supplying organizations in 85 regional centers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Based on these data, a methodology for assessing the level of transparency of tariff decisions in the field of technological connection is proposed, and calculations of the cost of technological connection (affordability level) to heat supply, water supply and sanitation systems are attached. Correlation analysis is used to identify the relationship between the characteristics of affordability and transparency with key indicators of housing construction. It is shown that in cities with a population of up to 100 thousand people, and from 500 thousand people and above the cost of technological connection are relatively similar. The lowest connection fees are in cities with a population of 250,000 to 500,000 people. Separately, the discrepancy between the high volumes of construction in cities with over one million people and the low level of transparency of payment for technological connection in them is highlighted. It was also found that the higher the connection cost, the higher the cost and profitability of construction, as well as the price per square meter, and with increased transparency, the profitability of construction also increases. The theoretical significance of the work lies in the development of a methodological approach to assessing the effectiveness of technological connection practices. The practical significance of the work lies in the classification of problems in the field of technological connection and the assessment of their impact on housing construction, which allows us to raise the question of the need to create a unified information system in the field of technological connection.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg O. Smirnov, 2023. "Assessment of the Impact of Transparency and Affordability of Technological Connection on the Developer's Decision on New Construction in Russian Cities," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(2), pages 355-380.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:22:y:2023:i:2:p:355-380
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.2.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2023/06_Smirnov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.2.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandr Kokovikhin & Ekaterina Ogorodnikova & Dina Williams & Andrey Plakhin, 2018. "Assessment of the Competitive Environment in the Regional Markets," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 79-94.
    2. Yvan Renou, 2017. "Performance indicators and the new governmentality of water utilities in France," Post-Print halshs-01362521, HAL.
    3. Elizabeth A Mack & Sarah Wrase, 2017. "A Burgeoning Crisis? A Nationwide Assessment of the Geography of Water Affordability in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Patureau, Rémi & Tran, Cong Toan & Gavan, Valentin & Stabat, Pascal, 2021. "The new generation of District heating & cooling networks and their potential development in France," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Shifan Deng & Siyu Ma & Xiaowen Zhang & Shiqiang Zhang, 2020. "Integrated Detection of a Complex Underground Water Supply Pipeline System in an Old Urban Community in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Nancey Green Leigh & Heonyeong Lee, 2019. "Sustainable and Resilient Urban Water Systems: The Role of Decentralization and Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Morgane Colombert & Youssef Diab, 2017. "Évolution du rôle des acteurs des réseaux de chaleur dans la conception urbaine," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 19(2), pages 197-220.
    8. Evgeny Malyshev & Anton Kashurnikov, 2015. "Planning Mechanisms for Regional Electric Power Supply System Development," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 214-225.
    9. Thomas Krikser & Adriano Profeta & Sebastian Grimm & Heiko Huther, 2020. "Willingness-to-Pay for District Heating from Renewables of Private Households in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Daniel Sklarew & Jennifer Sklarew, 2018. "Integrated Water-Energy Policy for Sustainable Development," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 10-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oleg O. Smirnov, Sergey B. Sivaev, 2024. "Routing Utility Transit Infrastructure: A Social Welfare Theory Approach," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 23(2), pages 341-363.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priscila Barros Ramalho Alves & Maria José de Sousa Cordão & Slobodan Djordjević & Akbar A. Javadi, 2020. "Place-Based Citizen Science for Assessing Risk Perception and Coping Capacity of Households Affected by Multiple Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Tihitina Andarge & Yongjie Ji & Bonnie L. Keeler & David A. Keiser & Conor McKenzie, 2023. "Environmental Justice and the Clean Water Act: Implications for Economic Analyses of Clean Water Regulations," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 5, pages 70-126, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Li, Xiang & Yilmaz, Selin & Patel, Martin K. & Chambers, Jonathan, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of fifth-generation district heating and cooling combined with seasonal borehole thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Burghard, Uta & Breitschopf, Barbara & Wohlfarth, Katharina & Müller, Fabian & Keil, Julia, 2021. "Perception of monetary and non-monetary effects on the energy transition: Results of a mixed method approach," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S04/2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Aslani, Babak & Mohebbi, Shima, 2022. "Predictive resilience of interdependent water and transportation infrastructures: A sociotechnical approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Dalia Štreimikienė & Vidas Lekavičius & Gintare Stankūnienė & Aušra Pažėraitė, 2022. "Renewable Energy Acceptance by Households: Evidence from Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Lauma Balode & Kristiāna Dolge & Dagnija Blumberga, 2021. "The Contradictions between District and Individual Heating towards Green Deal Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Shao-Ping Wang & Miao-Sheng Chen & Mou-Jian Li, 2019. "Taiwan’s Marketing Strategies for Green Conferences and Exhibitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Billerbeck, Anna & Breitschopf, Barbara & Preuß, Sabine & Winkler, Jenny & Ragwitz, Mario & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Perception of district heating in Europe: A deep dive into influencing factors and the role of regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Dhesigen Naidoo & Luxon Nhamo & Shenelle Lottering & Sylvester Mpandeli & Stanley Liphadzi & Albert T. Modi & Cristina Trois & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Transitional Pathways towards Achieving a Circular Economy in the Water, Energy, and Food Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Fagundes, Thalita Salgado & Cunha Marques, Rui & Malheiros, Tadeu Fabrício, 2024. "Are Brazilian water auction prices affordable for vulnerable families?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Cecilia Njoroge & Anja Smith & Marisa von Fintel, 2024. "Inequalities in Water Insecurity in Kenya: A Multidimensional Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 171-193, October.
    13. Jorge Salas & Víctor Yepes, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Tamara S. Wilson & Nathan D. Van Schmidt & Ruth Langridge, 2020. "Land-Use Change and Future Water Demand in California’s Central Coast," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Thomas Bolognesi & Antoine Brochet & Yvan Renou, 2021. "Assessing socio-technical resistance to public policy instruments: Insights from water performance indicators in the Grenoble area (France)," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(7), pages 1407-1435, November.
    16. Kempeneer, Shirley & Van Dooren, Wouter, 2019. "Using numbers that do not count: how the latent functions of performance indicators explain their success," SocArXiv vf9yn, Center for Open Science.
    17. Damman, Sigrid & Schmuck, Alexandra & Oliveira, Rosário & Koop, Steven (Stef) H.A. & Almeida, Maria do Céu & Alegre, Helena & Ugarelli, Rita Maria, 2023. "Towards a water-smart society: Progress in linking theory and practice," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Vittoria Battaglia & Francesca Ceglia & Davide Maria Laudiero & Alessandro Maione & Elisa Marrasso & Laura Vanoli, 2024. "Empowering Energy Communities through Geothermal Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Solis, Miriam & Bashar, Samira Binte, 2022. "Social equity implications of advanced water metering infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Gareth Hugh Thomas & Jack Flower & Rob Gross & Karen Henwood & Fiona Shirani & Jamie Speirs & Nick Pidgeon, 2024. "A relational approach to characterizing householder perceptions of disruption in heat transitions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(5), pages 570-579, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    utility connection; tariff regulation; utility infrastructure; heat supply; water supply; sanitation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L90 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - General
    • L97 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Utilities: General
    • L99 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:22:y:2023:i:2:p:355-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.