IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v19y2020i4p489-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of Promising Interaction Between a Timber Industry Enterprise and a Commodity Exchange in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • R.S. Rogulin

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the absence of works in the literature devoted to the formation of supply chains of materials in volumes sufficient for production using the apparatus of commodity exchanges. The aim of the work is to conduct an empirical study to assess the prospects for the interaction of a timber industry enterprise with a commodity exchange. For the study, a mathematical model was chosen to assess the effectiveness of the purchase of raw materials from the forestry department of the commodity exchange by an enterprise in the timber industry. The hypothesis is that the interaction of the timber industry complex can be beneficial for the enterprise. To ensure the feasibility of purchasing raw materials from the exchange, simulation modeling was chosen. For each individual simulation iteration, a linear integer programming mathematical model was used. To generate some input data, like price, demand, etc., the Monte Carlo method was used. The complexity of the problem lies in the following aspects: polynomial growth of the number of numbers; a large number of restrictions on the increase in the degree of complexity of finding the first feasible solution to the model; search for a solution within the framework of integer optimization; a fairly large number of independent simulation iterations. The practical significance of the study is to prove the expediency of purchasing raw materials by the enterprise from the commodity and raw materials exchange of Russia. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the development of a model for assessing the feasibility of purchasing materials using the exchange apparatus. The scientific novelty is based on the constructed mathematical model of the formation of supply chains and the volume of production, taking into account the demand in the market and the volume of materials. The model was tested on data from one forestry enterprise in the Primorsky Territory. Optimization is carried out in terms of the volume of products produced, the volume of purchased materials from each region and the stock of raw materials in the production warehouse. Based on the testing of data models of the exchange and the forestry enterprise, an analysis was performed of the possibilities for cooperation between the company and the commodity exchange. The work reflects the behavior in the long term of accumulated profit, the nature of changes in stock in the warehouse and the volume of products produced.

Suggested Citation

  • R.S. Rogulin, 2020. "Modeling of Promising Interaction Between a Timber Industry Enterprise and a Commodity Exchange in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(4), pages 489-511.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:4:p:489-511
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.4.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2020/04_Rogulin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.4.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schütz, Peter & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Ahmed, Shabbir, 2009. "Supply chain design under uncertainty using sample average approximation and dual decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 409-419, December.
    2. Georgiadis, Michael C. & Tsiakis, Panagiotis & Longinidis, Pantelis & Sofioglou, Maria K., 2011. "Optimal design of supply chain networks under uncertain transient demand variations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 254-272, June.
    3. Mehrdad Mehrbod & Nan Tu & Lixin Miao & Dai Wenjing, 2012. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming for a multi-objective closed-loop logistics network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 367-381, December.
    4. Elias Olivares-Benitez & José González-Velarde & Roger Ríos-Mercado, 2012. "A supply chain design problem with facility location and bi-objective transportation choices," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 729-753, October.
    5. Gopalakrishnan Easwaran & Halit Üster, 2010. "A closed-loop supply chain network design problem with integrated forward and reverse channel decisions," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(11), pages 779-792.
    6. Zhang, Guoquan & Shang, Jennifer & Li, Wenli, 2011. "Collaborative production planning of supply chain under price and demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 590-603, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    2. M. Fattahi & M. Mahootchi & S. M. Moattar Husseini, 2016. "Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 423-456, July.
    3. Longinidis, Pantelis & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "Integration of sale and leaseback in the optimal design of supply chain networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 73-89.
    4. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Fattahi, Mohammad, 2017. "Investigating risk and robustness measures for supply chain network design under demand uncertainty: A case study of glass supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 680-699.
    6. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil, 2017. "Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 176-200.
    7. Ben Mohamed, Imen & Klibi, Walid & Sadykov, Ruslan & Şen, Halil & Vanderbeck, François, 2023. "The two-echelon stochastic multi-period capacitated location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 645-667.
    8. Konstantinos Petridis, 2015. "Optimal design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under normally distributed demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 63-91, April.
    9. Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Farjana Nur & Amy E. Bednar & Mark Cowan, 2020. "Enhancing Benders decomposition algorithm to solve a combat logistics problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(1), pages 161-198, March.
    10. Baghalian, Atefeh & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani, 2013. "Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 199-215.
    11. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    12. Mohammaddust, Faeghe & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Mofidfar, Mohammad & Hill, Alex, 2017. "Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 632-653.
    13. Lin, Cheng-Chang & Wu, Yi-Chen, 2013. "Optimal pricing for build-to-order supply chain design under price-dependent stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-49.
    14. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    15. Pereira, Daniel Filipe & Oliveira, José Fernando & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2022. "Merging make-to-stock/make-to-order decisions into sales and operations planning: A multi-objective approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Michal Kaut & Kjetil Midthun & Adrian Werner & Asgeir Tomasgard & Lars Hellemo & Marte Fodstad, 2014. "Multi-horizon stochastic programming," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 179-193, January.
    17. Pudasaini, Pramesh, 2021. "Integrated planning of downstream petroleum supply chain: a multi-objective stochastic approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    18. Sajjad Aslani Khiavi & Hamid Khaloozadeh & Fahimeh Soltanian, 2021. "Suboptimal sliding manifold For nonlinear supply chain with time delay," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 151-173, July.
    19. Rafiei, Rezvan & Huang, Kai & Verma, Manish, 2022. "Cash versus in-kind transfer programs in humanitarian operations: An optimization program and a case study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    20. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    supply chains; enterprise economics; forest exchange; data analysis; resource consumption rate; warehouse capacity;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:19:y:2020:i:4:p:489-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.