IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/fpvfcf/v1y2024i26p46-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Analysis of the Common Agricultural Policy: Intersections of Agriculture, Economy and Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Cătălin Valentin LÄ‚PÄ‚DAT

    (University of Craiova)

  • Roxana Maria BÄ‚DÃŽRCEA

    (University of Craiova)

  • Alina Georgiana MANTA

    (University of Craiova)

  • Alexandra Ioana GEORGESCU

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

This study explores the trends and limitations of research on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in relation to agriculture, economy, and the environment, using a bibliometric analysis based on Web of science data. Employing co-citation maps and collaborative networks among authors and institutions, the study highlights a fragmented literature characterized by high thematic specialization and a low level of interconnectedness among researchers, hindering the development of a coherent and integrated framework. A detailed analysis of author collaborations and co-citation networks provides a clear view of the intellectual structure of the field and the ways ideas and research have been interconnected and developed over time. Additionally, the examination of highly cited articles and works has revealed not only the current gaps in research but also opportunities for future investigations. For instance, most studies have focused on the effects of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) funding on the environment, biodiversity, farmer behaviour, and the economic outcomes of the agricultural sector. However, they have largely overlooked a comprehensive understanding of how these interactions simultaneously influence all three dimensions: economic, environmental, and agricultural. This highlights a significant opportunity for research to explore more complex and integrated connections between CAP funding and its impact on these three pillars, considering the recent evolution and changes in the global economic landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Cătălin Valentin LÄ‚PÄ‚DAT & Roxana Maria BÄ‚DÃŽRCEA & Alina Georgiana MANTA & Alexandra Ioana GEORGESCU, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Common Agricultural Policy: Intersections of Agriculture, Economy and Environment," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(26), pages 46-65, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:fpvfcf:v:1:y:2024:i:26:p:46-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://feaa.ucv.ro/finance/fisiere/revista/156944592904_Lapadat_Badircea_Manta_Georgescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lankoski, Jussi & Thiem, Alrik, 2020. "Linkages between agricultural policies, productivity and environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Donald Deb. Beaver, 2001. "Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 365-377, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qingzhou Luo & Jianhong Cecilia Xia & Gaby Haddow & Michele Willson & Jun Yang, 2018. "Does distance hinder the collaboration between Australian universities in the humanities, arts and social sciences?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 695-715, May.
    2. Fernanda Morillo & Adrián A. Díaz-Faes & Borja González-Albo & Luz Moreno, 2014. "Do networking centres perform better? An exploratory analysis in Psychiatry and Gastroenterology/Hepatology in Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1401-1416, February.
    3. Tianwei He, 2009. "International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 571-582, September.
    4. Carillo, Maria Rosaria & Papagni, Erasmo & Sapio, Alessandro, 2013. "Do collaborations enhance the high-quality output of scientific institutions? Evidence from the Italian Research Assessment Exercise," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-36.
    5. Letina, Srebrenka, 2016. "Network and actor attribute effects on the performance of researchers in two fields of social science in a small peripheral community," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 571-595.
    6. Laurent R. Bergé, 2017. "Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 785-815, November.
    7. Lemarchand, Guillermo A., 2012. "The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 291-305.
    8. Kashyap Ravi, 2020. "The Economics of Enlightenment: Time Value of Knowledge and the Net Present Value (NPV) of Knowledge Machines, A Proposed Approach Adapted from Finance," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Olle Persson & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2014. "Discouraging honorific authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1417-1419, February.
    10. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    11. Christoph Bartneck & Jun Hu, 2010. "The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 41-52, October.
    12. M. Ausloos, 2013. "A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 895-909, June.
    13. Mary Frank Fox & Mary Lynn Realff & Diana Roldan Rueda & Jillian Morn, 2017. "International research collaboration among women engineers: frequency and perceived barriers, by regions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1292-1306, December.
    14. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Huang, Mu-Hsuan & Dong, Huei-Ru & Chen, Dar-Zen, 2012. "Globalization of collaborative creativity through cross-border patent activities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 226-236.
    16. J. Sylvan Katz & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2019. "Cooperation, scale-invariance and complex innovation systems: a generalization," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 1045-1065, November.
    17. Hildrun Kretschmer & Ute Kretschmer & Theo Kretschmer, 2007. "Reflection of co-authorship networks in the Web: Web hyperlinks versus Web visibility rates," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(2), pages 519-540, February.
    18. Ubfal, Diego & Maffioli, Alessandro, 2011. "The impact of funding on research collaboration: Evidence from a developing country," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1269-1279.
    19. Cummings, Jonathon N. & Kiesler, Sara, 2007. "Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1620-1634, December.
    20. Naomi Fukuzawa, 2014. "An empirical analysis of the relationship between individual characteristics and research productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 785-809, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CAP; economy; environment; bibliometric analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:fpvfcf:v:1:y:2024:i:26:p:46-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Manta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.