IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aii/ijcmss/v2y2011i3p78-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics in Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Shilpa Vivek Agrawal

    (D B Jain college of Managament Studies Chennai,India)

  • D.M Gujarathi

    (Chiarman BOS,Cost and works Accounting University of Pune,India)

Abstract

It is impossible to undertake Management Research without a consideration of effects of that research upon the people concerned. Thus, we need to consider our own ethical position as a starting point because that will affect both the nature of data collection and the way in which we set about analyzing that data and building theory from it. Management academics have tended to rely on ethics codes developed by social researchers in related fields to inform their research practice. The point of this paper is to question whether this remains a viable approach in the current climate that is characterized by a significant increase in ethical regulation across the social sciences? Many of us may be wondering why we are required to have training in research ethics. We may believe that we are highly ethical and know the difference between right and wrong. We would never fabricate or falsify data or plagiarize. Indeed, We also may believe that most of our colleagues are highly ethical and that there is no ethics problem in research. Management research requires that researcher explicitly understand their own values, examine and clarify traditions, perspectives, social process, values and attitude of self and others. This paper looks at the importance of ethical in management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilpa Vivek Agrawal & D.M Gujarathi, 2011. "Ethics in Management Research," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 2(3), pages 78-83, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:78-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/423/413
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://scholarshub.net/index.php/ijcms/article/view/423
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akaah, Ishmael P., 1997. "Influence of Deontological and Teleological Factors on Research Ethics Evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 71-80, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John R. Sparks, 2015. "Ethical judgments are different: an information processing perspective on the unique nature of ethical judgments and ethical judgment processes," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 5, pages 89-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Rajshekhar G. Javalgi & La Toya M. Russell, 2018. "International Marketing Ethics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 703-720, April.
    3. Kanika Bhal & Nivedita Leekha, 2008. "Exploring Cognitive Moral Logics Using Grounded Theory: The Case of Software Piracy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 635-646, September.
    4. Bruce W. Stening & Daniel W. Skubik, 2007. "Do international management researchers need a code of ethics?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 103-126, February.
    5. Cherry, John & Fraedrich, John, 2002. "Perceived risk, moral philosophy and marketing ethics: mediating influences on sales managers' ethical decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 951-962, December.
    6. Singhapakdi, Anusorn & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Lee, Dong-Jin, 2010. "Is small business better than big business for marketing managers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 418-423, April.
    7. Aimee E. Smith & Natalina Zlatevska & Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury & Alex Belli, 2023. "A Meta-Analytical Assessment of the Effect of Deontological Evaluations and Teleological Evaluations on Ethical Judgments/Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 553-588, December.
    8. Ming-Tien Tsai & Kun-Shiang Chen & Jui-Lin Chien, 2012. "The factors impact of knowledge sharing intentions: the theory of reasoned action perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1479-1491, August.
    9. Sheng-Hsiung Chang & Ching-Hsien Chou, 2018. "Consumer Intention toward Bringing Your Own Shopping Bags in Taiwan: An Application of Ethics Perspective and Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    10. John Sparks & Yue Pan, 2010. "Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 405-418, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Management Research; Ethics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aii:ijcmss:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:78-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mr. Asif Anjum (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.